2016
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An economic model predictive control approach to integrated production management and process operation

Abstract: Managing production schedules and tracking time‐varying demand of certain products while optimizing process economics are subjects of central importance in industrial applications. We investigate the use of economic model predictive control (EMPC) in tracking a production schedule. Specifically, given that only a small subset of the total process state vector is typically required to track certain scheduled values, we design a novel EMPC scheme, through proper construction of the objective function and constra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the key goals to design and implement new controllers is to achieve a faster response during the transient [27]. For the proposed AFN-FTSC scheme, the larger values of these user-defined parameters will ensure fast-transient performance.…”
Section: Selection Of the User-defined Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key goals to design and implement new controllers is to achieve a faster response during the transient [27]. For the proposed AFN-FTSC scheme, the larger values of these user-defined parameters will ensure fast-transient performance.…”
Section: Selection Of the User-defined Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in [56] HVAC from a commercial building is controlled thanks to EMPC. In [57] the scheduling of a chemical stirred tank reactor is performed with EMPC. In [3], a supermarket refrigeration, a heat pump, a heat tank with a solar collector and an electric vehicle are controlled thanks to EMPC.…”
Section: Economic Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between setting δ 5 = 1 and having t k ≥ t 0 is that it is assumed that after t 0 , the constraint of Eq 45 is not again inactivated, whereas it is not necessary to maintain δ 5 = 1 for all times, such that the constraint of Eq 45 can be activated for finite periods of time when xðt k Þ ∈ Ωρ e by this condition. The term containing δ 4 is also used to activate Eq 45 regardless of the location of xðt k Þ in state-space, but unlike δ 5 , it is used to activate Eq 45 only when the magnitudes of the n f components of the measured state vector are not within the corresponding γ i of their steady-state value [51]. Because the γ i , i = 1, : : : , n f , are taken to be positive constants, when δ 4 = 0, then δ 4 jx i ðt k Þj = 0 cannot be greater than or equal to γ i , which means that the condition δ 4 jx i ðt k Þj ≥ γ i cannot be used to activate Eq 45.…”
Section: Data-gathering Lyapunov-based Empc Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%