1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3199(97)00101-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An economic analysis of three hydrogen liquefaction systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are based on many Refs. [13,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and are graphically shown in Figs. 3-5.…”
Section: Economics Of Wind-h 2 Systems: Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are based on many Refs. [13,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and are graphically shown in Figs. 3-5.…”
Section: Economics Of Wind-h 2 Systems: Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The thermal flux in the other directions has been assumed negligible from a conservative point of view. 5.…”
Section: The Acceptability Envelope Physical Model For Metal Hydridesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compression requires high pressures, on the order of 350-700 bar or higher, requiring a great amount of work [1,2]. In the case of liquefaction, high gravimetric densities are achieved at low pressures, but the process is even more expensive than pure compression due to the electric power required to cool the hydrogen to sufficiently low temperatures (approximately 20 K at 1 bar) [1,3] and the issue of continual boil with its reduction in efficiency must be addressed. The use of a media for storage permits hydrogen to be stored at relatively low pressures compared to compressed hydrogen storage, and requires far less electric power consumption than needed for liquefaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cost of hydrogen liquefaction depends primarily on the production rate and the system e$ciency (Syed et al, 1998). Increasing the production rate generally decreases the cost.…”
Section: Observations On System Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%