2018
DOI: 10.1287/isre.2017.0744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Economic Analysis of Peer Disclosure in Online Social Communities

Abstract: We study a novel privacy concern, viz. peer disclosure of sensitive personal information in online social communities. We model peer disclosure as imposing a negative externality on other people. Our model encompasses the benefits from posting information, positive externalities such as recognition and entertainment benefits due to others' sharing of information, and heterogeneous privacy preferences. We find that regulation of peer disclosure is necessary. We consider two candidate regulations -nudging and qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contributors will perceive that they have a better reputation when more members come to appreciate the knowledge they have shared (Beck et al., 2014; Kankanhalli et al., 2005). Thus, feeling a sense of connection to a greater number of VC members naturally elevates the contributor's feeling of recognition: Put simply, this positive externality indicates that the contributor's knowledge sharing is recognized by a greater number of members (Cao et al., 2018). Therefore, a member who feels connected to a greater number of members is more likely to perceive that their reputation is bolstered by knowledge sharing.…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributors will perceive that they have a better reputation when more members come to appreciate the knowledge they have shared (Beck et al., 2014; Kankanhalli et al., 2005). Thus, feeling a sense of connection to a greater number of VC members naturally elevates the contributor's feeling of recognition: Put simply, this positive externality indicates that the contributor's knowledge sharing is recognized by a greater number of members (Cao et al., 2018). Therefore, a member who feels connected to a greater number of members is more likely to perceive that their reputation is bolstered by knowledge sharing.…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a population is composed of just one type of entity, for example, a group of people, it can be called unimodal (Alhajj & Rokne, 2018, p. 1241). Instances of unimodal decentralized networks include dispersed social media communities (Bapna et al, 2017; Cao et al, 2018; Lee et al, 2016; Zeng & Wei, 2013) and organization networks (Chellappa & Saraf, 2010; Kwon et al, 2007; Sykes et al, 2009). When more than one type of entity exists, for example, a group of people and the documents they collectively edit, it is referred to as a ‘bimodal’ network (Alhajj & Rokne, 2018, p. 1241).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies on online privacy assessed that the combination of different claims and supporting arguments is most promising to nudge an increase in privacy concerns [2]. Meanwhile, providing information about the incompatibility of goods during the purchasing process improves the online shopping behavior [29], while digital nudging may also influence users to reflect on their own sharing behavior and potentially related privacy concerns [30].…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Bounded Rationality and Digital Nmentioning
confidence: 99%