2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of energy (energy ratio) and energy productivity were 0.59 and 0.74 kg/MJ, respectively. In other studies, the rate of energy in staketomato production in the Tokat province of Turkey (Esengun et al 2007) and tomato production in greenhouse in Antalya, Turkey (Ozkan et al 2004) were reported to be 0.80 and 1.26, respectively. Cetin and Vardar (2008) found that energy ratio and energy productivity in tomato production in the south Marmara region of Turkey were 0.8 and 0.99 kg/MJ, respectively.…”
Section: Analysis Of Input-output Energy Use In Tomato Productionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The rate of energy (energy ratio) and energy productivity were 0.59 and 0.74 kg/MJ, respectively. In other studies, the rate of energy in staketomato production in the Tokat province of Turkey (Esengun et al 2007) and tomato production in greenhouse in Antalya, Turkey (Ozkan et al 2004) were reported to be 0.80 and 1.26, respectively. Cetin and Vardar (2008) found that energy ratio and energy productivity in tomato production in the south Marmara region of Turkey were 0.8 and 0.99 kg/MJ, respectively.…”
Section: Analysis Of Input-output Energy Use In Tomato Productionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The total mean expenditure for the production was 7,816 $/ha, where 92.2% was the share of variable costs, whereas 7.8% was fixed expenditures. Several studies reported that the ratio of variable cost was higher than that of fixed cost in cropping systems (Esengun et al 2007;Ҫetin, Vardar 2008;Mohammadi et al Kitani (1999) 6. Wood (packaging) (kg dry mass) 18 MJ/kg Singh, Mittal (1992) 7.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Economic Analysis Of Apple Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy use efficiency of main product (EUE M ) for rice (4.9) is higher than wheat due to higher average grain yield of rice than wheat (Table 2). Earlier scientists reported different EUE M values for different crops like 7.2 for wheat (Singh et al, 1997), 8.4 for maize (Hetz, 1992) and 0.8 for stake-tomato (Esengun et al, 2006). Bockari-Gevao et al, (2005) reported EUE M for rice without irrigation was 8.86 for Malaysia.…”
Section: Energy Indicesmentioning
confidence: 97%