1935
DOI: 10.2307/1213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ecological Study of the Invertebrate Fauna of a Chalk Stream Near Great Driffield, Yorkshire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) and biomass of invertebrates on the five biotopes at Bagnor revealed the importance of submerged macrophytes compared to gravel and silt. This result was not unexpected and has been recognised in a number of previous studies on chalk streams (Whitehead, 1935; and also more widely on other lowland river systems (Wright et al, 1992). At Bagnor, marginal emergent vegetation was scarce but in other lowland streams, marginal emergents with their root systems under water frequently support a wider range of taxa than submerged macrophytes (Wright et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4) and biomass of invertebrates on the five biotopes at Bagnor revealed the importance of submerged macrophytes compared to gravel and silt. This result was not unexpected and has been recognised in a number of previous studies on chalk streams (Whitehead, 1935; and also more widely on other lowland river systems (Wright et al, 1992). At Bagnor, marginal emergent vegetation was scarce but in other lowland streams, marginal emergents with their root systems under water frequently support a wider range of taxa than submerged macrophytes (Wright et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Many authors have described the longitudinal distribution of the invertebrate fauna along a given river system (see Hawkes, 1975) and a number of studies have been undertaken on chalk streams in England (Whitehead, 1935;Casey & Ladle, 1976;Pearson & Jones, 1984;Pinder & Fan-, 1987). More detailed information on the occurrence of invertebrates on particular biotopes within chalk streams has also been published (Harrod, 1964;Westlake et al, 1972;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean numbers per m2 were calculated from samples taken at various depths. Earlier sampling demonstrated that the snails ware not encountered on the muddy substrates found at greater depths (see also WHITEHEAD, 1935). Moreover, the majority of the snails were caught between 0-5 m depth in Lake l and between 0-1.5 m depth in Lake II in all seasons (Dorgelo, unpublished data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…); she made an inventory of the macrophytes of Lake I from (BEST, 1981 and saw, during Scuba diving, far more P.jenkinsi on Chain than on Elodea. WHITEHEAD (1935), studying a chalk stream, found very low numbers of P.jenkinsi or none at all in stony regions, on mud, and on Callitriche sp., Potamogeton perfoliatus, Ranunculu$ spp., and Slum erectum. Many snails were seen, however, on Hippurus vulgaris.…”
Section: Relationship To Macrophytesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chironomidae) in the macrophyte habitat. Therefore it could overestimate the density, biomass, richness, and diversity of macroinvertebrates on that habitat (Percival and Whitehead 1929;Whitehead 1935;Barber and Kevern 1973;Wright 1992;Ó Hare and Murphy 1999).…”
Section: Habitat Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%