2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ecological quality status assessment procedure for soft-sediment benthic habitats: Weighing alternative approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequences of environmentally driven changes in biodiversity to BP c , and its relation to ecosystem functioning, have been explored in this way in terrestrial (Bunker et al 2005) and marine habitats (Solan et al 2004a,b); at the local (Lohrer et al 2010;Teal et al 2013) and regional scales (Queir os et al 2011;Birchenough et al 2012;Solan et al 2012); for different contexts (e.g., habitat structure and hypoxia, Queir os et al Van Colen et al 2012;Villn€ as et al 2012); and for a variety of ecosystem functions including productivity , nutrient cycling (Solan et al 2004a), carbon storage (Bunker et al 2005;Solan et al 2012), and decomposition (Josefson et al 2012). By calculating BP c over time, or for different locations or scenarios, changes in the efficiency of the organism-sediment couple can be monitored for compliance in support of management and policy objectives (Painting et al 2012;Van Hoey et al 2013). For example, the effects of simulated changes in benthic com-munity structure have previously been used to explore possible changes in ecosystem properties like sediment organic carbon at the North Sea scale, based on empirically derived relationships between BP c and sediment organic carbon (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of environmentally driven changes in biodiversity to BP c , and its relation to ecosystem functioning, have been explored in this way in terrestrial (Bunker et al 2005) and marine habitats (Solan et al 2004a,b); at the local (Lohrer et al 2010;Teal et al 2013) and regional scales (Queir os et al 2011;Birchenough et al 2012;Solan et al 2012); for different contexts (e.g., habitat structure and hypoxia, Queir os et al Van Colen et al 2012;Villn€ as et al 2012); and for a variety of ecosystem functions including productivity , nutrient cycling (Solan et al 2004a), carbon storage (Bunker et al 2005;Solan et al 2012), and decomposition (Josefson et al 2012). By calculating BP c over time, or for different locations or scenarios, changes in the efficiency of the organism-sediment couple can be monitored for compliance in support of management and policy objectives (Painting et al 2012;Van Hoey et al 2013). For example, the effects of simulated changes in benthic com-munity structure have previously been used to explore possible changes in ecosystem properties like sediment organic carbon at the North Sea scale, based on empirically derived relationships between BP c and sediment organic carbon (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, within the studied area it was possible to identify and map the bottom trawling marks, which is considered to be the main pressure on the soft bottoms located at depths greater than 100 m. This information has been used (or is proposed to be used) for the development of different methodological approaches for assessing the seafloor integrity (Galparsoro et al, 2013;Korpinen et al, 2013;Van Hoey et al, 2013), which could contribute to C2 "Condition of benthic community".…”
Section: Benthic Habitat Mapping Within the Marine Strategy Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSs evaluate benthic habitat condition under various environmental directives, and with a variety of assessment approaches, e.g., multi-metric benthic indicators (see below) [10]. Most approaches rely on habitat-stratified species-abundance data, collected with a variety of sampling gears.…”
Section: Benthic Habitat Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%