Group Work in the English Language Curriculum 2014
DOI: 10.1057/9781137008787_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ecological Perspective on the Interactive Second Language Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This might also be due to the fact that it was the first time the students participated in such a technology based language class, being at a school with no computer or Internet access. The advantages of group work (Chappell, 2014;Storch & Wigglesworth, 2007) were evident in the students' comments on how group members solved problems. As one participant put it, "we overcame the difficulties we encountered together".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might also be due to the fact that it was the first time the students participated in such a technology based language class, being at a school with no computer or Internet access. The advantages of group work (Chappell, 2014;Storch & Wigglesworth, 2007) were evident in the students' comments on how group members solved problems. As one participant put it, "we overcame the difficulties we encountered together".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bunun nedeni, öğrencilerin ilk kez böyle bir teknolojiye dayalı dil dersine katılmaları, bilgisayar ve internet erişimi olmayan bir okulda bulunmaları olabilir. Öğrencilerin grup üyelerinin problemleri nasıl çözdükleri konusundaki yorumları grup çalışmasının avantajlarını (Chappell, 2014;Storch & Wigglesworth, 2007) ortaya koyar niteliktedir. Bir katılımcının dediği gibi, "karşılaştığımız zorlukları birlikte aştık.…”
Section: Bulgular Ve Tartışmaunclassified
“…Teacher‐educators and student‐teachers not only gain access to all related knowledge about learning, using, and practicing how to teach and assess the target language but also construct their identities by using that language in interaction (Chappell, 2014; Walsh, 2013). Therefore, for the study presented in this article, English is not only the means of instruction but also the means through which teacher‐educators and student‐teachers observe and learn how to teach and assess English and how to interact with each other in the classroom (Graves, 2009; K. E. Johnson, 2006, 2009; Nguyen, 2013).…”
Section: Interactional Identities In English Language Education Class...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vygotsky (1989( , as cited in Chappell, 2014) theorises that 'we become ourselves through others'. When applied to second language studies, this theory suggests that social interaction is essential for human learning and that individuals systematically learn skills and knowledge through this interaction and through the mediation of expert others, be they teachers or fellow students (Chappell, 2014). From my teaching experience, in comparing one-to-one and group classes, I have come to the belief that this social interaction aids learning most effectively in group situations since other students can be viewed as experts in their own learning experiences and this allows for mutual aid, which Kurland and Salmon (2006, p.79) see as being 'at the heart of group work practice'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it is this very sequential or cyclical nature of classes that makes it so difficult for a teacher to join a class in the middle of its lifespan. However, the problem can be eased if explicit account is taken of the relations between what is said in that lesson and what has been said before in the preceding lessons (Chappell, 2014). Therefore, to prepare for my facilitation, I observed two preceding group sessions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%