2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ecological framework for the analysis of prebiotic chemical reaction networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we may be able to break the complexity of large chemical networks into smaller, more manageable structures (45). Additionally, autocatalytic cores are the building block of evolution in prebiotic chemistries (35); thus their identification paves the way to a systematic exploration of the possible modes of chemical evolution (46,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, we may be able to break the complexity of large chemical networks into smaller, more manageable structures (45). Additionally, autocatalytic cores are the building block of evolution in prebiotic chemistries (35); thus their identification paves the way to a systematic exploration of the possible modes of chemical evolution (46,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…each non-food molecule is generated at least as fast as it is used up), by lemma 4.1 of [17]. Other dynamical aspects of RAFs concerning reaction rates have been explored in [15,20], and related dynamics have been explored recently by [25,26].…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies used artificial chemistry as an avenue for addressing questions related to the origin of life or to general mathematical properties of biochemical networks (Banzhaf and Yamamoto 2015;Kauffman 1993;Benkö et al 2003;Walter Fontana and Buss 1994a, b;Peng et al 2020). Conversely, FBA has been applied mostly to the study of metabolic networks of real organisms (Gu et al 2019;Kauffman et al 2003;Orth et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%