2000
DOI: 10.1080/713684677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ecological Focus for Landscape Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a shortage of spatially explicit guidelines at the landscape level, based on ecological thresholds (Moss, 2000;Boothby, 2000;Opdam et al, 2002). For example, scientific ecological information for many species is still not available and ecological indicators for sustainable landscape patterns are in a preliminary state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a shortage of spatially explicit guidelines at the landscape level, based on ecological thresholds (Moss, 2000;Boothby, 2000;Opdam et al, 2002). For example, scientific ecological information for many species is still not available and ecological indicators for sustainable landscape patterns are in a preliminary state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inevitably draws attention to the factors driving and directing changes in the landscape. Landscape configurations and patterns change with more or less intentional land use planning processes and the actions involved (Antrop, 1998;Boothby, 2000;Marcucci, 2000). Changes, largely related to the complex interactions of abiotic and biotic factors including humans, transform landscape patterns through time.…”
Section: Introduction To Landscape Change Trajectory Analysis (Lcta)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Change Index indicated oak woodland continuity but land use change trajectory analysis within oak woodlands showed variable land use change trajectories for different woodland patches. Therefore, prior to implementation of any management or conservation plans, landscape processes should be understood at multiple scales (Noss, 1990;Herrmann and Osinski, 1999;Boothby, 2000;Gulinck et al, 2001). This challenges evaluation of landscape functions and highlights the importance of overall change processes at multiple scales to those of single time and scale spatial patterns of the landscape.…”
Section: How Can Change Trajectory Analyses Facilitate Assessment Of mentioning
confidence: 98%