An eco‐evolutionary perspective on the humpty‐dumpty effect and community restoration

Abstract

In recent decades, anthropogenic and natural disturbances have increased in rate and intensity around the world, leaving few ecosystems unaffected. As a result of the interactions among these multiple disturbances, many biological communities now occur in a degraded state as collections of fragmented ecological pieces. Restoration strategies are traditionally driven by assumptions that a community or ecosystem can be restored back to a pre‐disturbance state through ecological remediation. Yet despite our best efforts, attempts to restore fragmented communities are often unsuccessful. One explanation, the humpty‐dumpty effect, suggests that once a community is disassembled, it is difficult to reassemble it even in the presence of all the original pieces. This hypothesis, while potentially useful, often fails to incorporate the multitude of other critical mechanisms that affect our abilities to put fragmented communities back together. Here, we extend the original humpty‐dumpty analogy to incorporate eco‐evolutionary changes that can hinder successful restoration. A systematic literature review uncovered few studies that have explicitly considered how the original humpty‐dumpty effect has affected restoration success in the 30 years since its inception. Using case studies, we demonstrate how the application of our extended eco‐evolutionary humpty‐dumpty framework may determine the success of restoration actions via ecological and evolutionary changes in fragments of communities. Lastly, given continued anthropogenic disturbances and projected climatic changes, we make five recommendations to facilitate more successful restoration efforts given our revised eco‐evolutionary humpty‐dumpty effects framework. These guidelines, combined with clearly defined management goals are aimed at both keeping ecological communities as intact as possible while ensuring that future ecosystem restorations might more successfully put the ecological community pieces back together.

Recovery patterns in community composition of fruit‐feeding butterflies following 26 years of active forest restoration

“…The few available studies on beetles (Audino et al, 2014;Grimbacher & Catterall, 2007), galling insects (Fernandes et al, 2010), butterflies (Nyafwono et al, 2014;Sant'Anna et al, 2014), and soil macrofauna (Amazonas et al, 2018) have found that after restoration, community composition and diversity of invertebrates tend to be increasingly more similar to primary forest communities as the age of restored forests increases. In general, some characteristics of forest communities (e.g., overall diversity) tend to recover more rapidly, while others (e.g., community composition) most likely need hundreds of years to recover (Dunn, 2004;Rozendaal et al, 2019), and some characteristics may not recover at all (Evans et al, 2022). Furthermore, the recovery of some biodiversity facets (Maxwell et al, 2022;Rocha et al, 2019) is notably poorly studied (Barber et al, 2017).…”