“…ICP-OES, on the other hand, offers an improved performance for non-metals owing to the capabilities of most current instruments to monitor wavelengths down to 165 nm, thus allowing the measurement of resonance lines (which are usually more sensitive) for P or S. It appears feasible to further decrease this limit down to 120 nm, which may be beneficial for the determination of Br and Cl. 325,326 The potential of ICP-MS for the measurement of non-metals has also been implemented in recent years with the arrival of collision/reaction cells, which can minimize the effect of polyatomic interferences traditionally hampering the reliable determination of some of these elements, such as S or P. 327 These interferences are, in any case, further reduced when ETV is used for sample introduction, as discussed in sections 3.5.2 and 3.5.3, 328 making this technique appealing for ultratrace determination of some nonmetals. Finally, the use of ETV-ICP-based techniques can also offer significant improvements over ETAAS for the trace determination of very refractory elements.…”