An East Asian Approach to Rural Development: A Comparative of the Saemaul Undong and FELDA Programs

Abstract

The study of East Asia has generally focused on its national development experience with emphasis given to industrial urban-based growth. However, the region has also been credited for impressive rural growth due to the Northeast Asian land reform and overall investment for a Green Revolution by states. Less emphasis has been given to a comparative exploration of different rural development programs that existed. Studies on rural development programs within the region have been diverse with case-specific perspectives, rather than in accordance with a unified conceptualization of what it means to have successful rural development. This article attempts to address that gap by evaluating two cases, the South Korean Saemaul Undong and the Malaysian Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA). It applies three different development perspectives; the neoliberal approach, the developmental state approach, and the humancentered approach, to determine the degree to which these programs can be considered successful. An East Asian conceptualization of successful rural development is identified based on an emphasis on government capacity, grassroots participation, a shared mentality for national development and a prioritization on building human capital.

Inter Vivos Gift as Land Inheritance Mechanism for FELDA Land Holding

“…The main objectives of FELDA are to focus on resettlement schemes for the landless person and to reduce rural poverty (Barau & Said, 2016;Saadun et al, 2018). To date, FELDA is the world's biggest Crude Palm Oil (CPO) producer, with an output of 3.1 million tons annually (Tong, 2017) and one of the most effective land settlement schemes in the world (Kamaruddin, 2018). In order to achieve the objectives, FELDA settlers must be Malaysian citizens and do not have any land except less than two acres or one lot of urban land for residential or both as set out in Section 19, Land (Group Settlement Areas) Act 1960 (Kadimi, 2006;Mat Som, 2003).…”