1998
DOI: 10.1080/01440361908539571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Early Tudor Debate on the Relation between Law and Equity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…72 Equity's popularity, and the litigant's increasing desire for it, came from a simple fact of bureaucratic efficiency based on 'an independent body of rules regulating, amongst other things, the transfer and enjoyment of real property', where 'the Chancellor had taken on the mantle of an appellate court, meddling with the proceedings and reviewing the decisions of the common law courts according to principles of equity or conscience.' 73 But desire also came from a pervasive and popular appreciation of Equity as an idea. There was a sixteenth-century culture saturated in Equity as a 'powerful concept' that More would undoubtedly have appreciated and understood.…”
Section: The Popular and Energetic Bureaucratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72 Equity's popularity, and the litigant's increasing desire for it, came from a simple fact of bureaucratic efficiency based on 'an independent body of rules regulating, amongst other things, the transfer and enjoyment of real property', where 'the Chancellor had taken on the mantle of an appellate court, meddling with the proceedings and reviewing the decisions of the common law courts according to principles of equity or conscience.' 73 But desire also came from a pervasive and popular appreciation of Equity as an idea. There was a sixteenth-century culture saturated in Equity as a 'powerful concept' that More would undoubtedly have appreciated and understood.…”
Section: The Popular and Energetic Bureaucratmentioning
confidence: 99%