2015
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2015.2459061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ear-Worn Vital Signs Monitor

Abstract: This work presents a wearable vital signs monitor at the ear. The monitor measures the electrocardiogram (ECG), ballistocardiogram (BCG), and photoplethysmogram (PPG) to obtain pre-ejection period (PEP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and pulse transit time (PTT). The ear is demonstrated as a natural anchoring point for the integrated sensing of physiological signals. All three signals measured can be used to obtain heart rate. Combining the ECG and BCG allows for the estimation of the PEP, while com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results also pointed out that SNRs agreed with the results taken from ECG signals (Figure 9 and Figure 10), skin–electrode contact impedance (Figure 8), simulation in Comsol (Figure 7), and the electrical conductivity values to realise the effect of GN. Meanwhile, we have also compared acquired ear-lead ECG signals by the proposed GN-based electrode with recently published work by Da He [28] who reported ECG signals obtained by Ag/AgCl gel electrodes using a behind-the-ear device. In the results reported, only R-waves appeared clearly including various noisy data, however, our results clearly identify P-waves, QRS-complex, and T-waves with less noise (see in Figure 11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results also pointed out that SNRs agreed with the results taken from ECG signals (Figure 9 and Figure 10), skin–electrode contact impedance (Figure 8), simulation in Comsol (Figure 7), and the electrical conductivity values to realise the effect of GN. Meanwhile, we have also compared acquired ear-lead ECG signals by the proposed GN-based electrode with recently published work by Da He [28] who reported ECG signals obtained by Ag/AgCl gel electrodes using a behind-the-ear device. In the results reported, only R-waves appeared clearly including various noisy data, however, our results clearly identify P-waves, QRS-complex, and T-waves with less noise (see in Figure 11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it allowed simplicity of integration with ECG sensors via Bluetooth. We also compared our ear-lead ECG results with recently proposed by Da He [27] who worked to get ECG data using behind-the-ear device (Figure 11a). Figure 11a shows a comparison of ECG results taken from the ear in Da He's work and ours.…”
Section: A Ecg Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aim of this paper was to investigate ECG signals when different types of electrodes (gel and dry electrodes) have been placed on different locations on the body, such as chest, ear and arm regions. Moreover, this design is less disrupted by motion artifacts for ear-lead ECG monitoring when compared to the previous work which is done by Da He [27] using two ECG sensors. In the future, this option not only gives flexibility to the patient, but also can give the clinicians to access the physiological data in real time via online access from personal healthcare records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies based on different technical solutions shows correlation between PTT and BP [5]- [11], but improvements are necessary. Most of the studies measured the time from ECG R-peak to the pulse wave reached a peripheral artery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%