2016
DOI: 10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Comparative Study of Articulation on Science Textbook Concepts and Extracted Concepts in Learning Objectives Using Semantic Network Analysis - Focus on Life Science Domain -

Abstract: Whether textbooks faithfully reflect the curriculum contents is an important educational issue. The previous studies on the textbooks did not analyze the relationship described in the textbooks or the structure. In this regard, this study aims to analyze how the concept of life science area in the elementary school science textbooks developed on the basis of the 2009 revised curriculum is linked. In addition, it seeks to analyze how the concept presented in the learning content achievement standards of the cur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After thus reorganizing and selecting the concepts, we visualized each of the semantic networks as a 1-mode network, organized for curriculum, textbooks, classroom teaching and assessment. On the other hand, each was visualized as a 2-mode network in order to analyze the alignment across curriculum, textbooks, classroom teaching and assessment (Jeong et al, 2019;Kim & Kwon, 2016). Table 1 provides the frequency and example of the eigenvector centrality of concepts used in the curriculum network in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After thus reorganizing and selecting the concepts, we visualized each of the semantic networks as a 1-mode network, organized for curriculum, textbooks, classroom teaching and assessment. On the other hand, each was visualized as a 2-mode network in order to analyze the alignment across curriculum, textbooks, classroom teaching and assessment (Jeong et al, 2019;Kim & Kwon, 2016). Table 1 provides the frequency and example of the eigenvector centrality of concepts used in the curriculum network in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems to be due to teachers' intentions to teach as many concepts as possible, although there is a possibility that the various related concepts are used in class to explain the contents of the presented curriculum (Jeong et al, 2010). However, presenting a large number of concepts to students is likely to be a distraction from learning process (Kim & Kwon, 2016). Therefore, it seems that there is a need to establish guidelines for a desirable degree to which the concepts presented in the curriculum are taught (Jeong et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected concepts were visualized using the NetMiner program. The networks of the four subdomains of the biotechnology domain of the Iran high school biology textbook were visualized as a 1-mode network, and the linkage analysis between the middle units was visualized as a 2-mode network (Kim et al, 2022;Kim & Kwon, 2016;Lim et al, 2021). Furthermore, by analyzing the networks of the top 20% of the appearance frequency, we analyzed how the main concepts are connected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%