An axiomatization of philosophical epistemology (a conceptual synthesis of Leibniz' rationalism and the empiricism of Locke, Hume, Moore)

Лобовиков, Владимир Олегович

doi:10.17223/1998863x/36/7

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The " Fig. 3" visually demonstrates (just shows) that the axiomatic epistemology system in question is quite consistent in spite of the above-mentioned alleged contradiction between the deontic logic of Wright-Kalinowski and the axiomatic epistemology system [5], [6]. The classical modal deontic logic of Wright-Kalinowski is quite adequate in relation to O 2 α but not adequate in relation to O 1 α.…”

Section: Three Different Kinds Of "Obligatory" Synthesized In One mentioning

confidence: 96%

“…The square and hexagon modelling logical relations among the three different philosophical-epistemologyconcepts (K, A, and E) are represented, for instance, in [5]. The axiomatic epistemology system  is represented, for instance, in [6].…”

Section: Axiom Scheme Ax-3: Amentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The axiomatic epistemology system  precisely defines the border-line between the two not-empty paradigmdomains. The two are logically combined in one conceptual scheme modelled by relevant square and hexagon of opposition showing convincingly that the relation between apriori-ism and empiricism is the contrariety one [5], [6]. Those who believe that a-priori-knowledge does not exist, believe in monopoly position of the above fig.1.…”

Section: Oαmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Squaring and Hexagonizing Logical Relations Among Three Different Kinds of Deontic Modality “Obligatory” A Model for Logically Formalized Axiomatic Epistemology Theory

Лобовиков¹

2019

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In contrast and complement to the logical square and hexagon by G. Kalinowski modeling logic of norms, in this paper such logical square and hexagon of conceptual opposition are submitted which model logical interconnections among three different kinds of deontic modality "obligatory". The qualitative differentiation among the three is in accordance with a logically formalized axiomatic epistemology theory. It is proved that the axiomatic theory is consistent and implies substantial difference between a-priori knowledge of obligatory-ness and a-posteriori one. The paper submits a formal inference (in that axiomatic theory) of the logic equivalence of modalities "necessary" and "obligatory" from the assumption that the relevant knowledge is a-priori one. Formal proving that theorem means the conditional equivalence of corresponding deontic and alethic modalities. This is a significant explication and correction of the modality views which many philosophers are used to. Squaring and hexagonizing logical relations among the three different kinds of deontic modality "obligatory" helps to grasp the novel idea effectively.

show abstract

Section: Three Different Kinds Of "Obligatory" Synthesized In One mentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Axiom Scheme Ax-3: Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Oαmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Squaring and Hexagonizing Logical Relations Among Three Different Kinds of Deontic Modality “Obligatory” A Model for Logically Formalized Axiomatic Epistemology Theory

Лобовиков¹

2019

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Одной из возможных форм движения в указанном направлении было построение некой аксиоматической системы философской эпистемологии, синтезирующей рационалистический априоризм и радикальный эмпиризм [33][34][35][36][37][38]. К настоящему времени эта аксиоматическая система претерпела существенное изменение (дополнение, уточнение и трансформацию).…”

unclassified

Evolutionary epistemology and non-normal modal logic of knowledge

Лобовиков¹

2018

Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Pol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

С эволюционной точки зрения формула «Если агент знает, что q, то q» парадоксальна. Предлагается заменить ее доказуемость на выводимость из некоторого эпистемически значимого допущения. Это допущение точно определяется с помощью аксиоматической системы эпистемологии, в которой доказуема теорема «Если агент знает, что q, то, если агент a priori знает, что q, то q». Ключевые слова: эволюционная эпистемология, эпистемическая логика, ненормальная модальная логика.

show abstract

“…Русакова О. Ф., Русаков В. М. Парадигма мобильности в современном политическом медиадискурсе // Вопросы политологии. 2016. № 4 (24).…”

unclassified

Untitled

2017

Discourse-P

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An axiomatization of philosophical epistemology (a conceptual synthesis of Leibniz' rationalism and the empiricism of Locke, Hume, Moore)

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Squaring and Hexagonizing Logical Relations Among Three Different Kinds of Deontic Modality “Obligatory” A Model for Logically Formalized Axiomatic Epistemology Theory

Squaring and Hexagonizing Logical Relations Among Three Different Kinds of Deontic Modality “Obligatory” A Model for Logically Formalized Axiomatic Epistemology Theory

Evolutionary epistemology and non-normal modal logic of knowledge

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About