1992
DOI: 10.1016/0893-9659(92)90084-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An axiomatic definition of shannon's entropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this letter we give alternative axiomatic systems, which replace the expendability and maximality axioms with the axiom that states the uniform distribution entropy can be analytical continued if it is taken as the function of the distribution dimension, the property that has an important role in asymptotic analysis of entropy [10] (see [11] for alternative approach). The presented results generalizes discussion in [12], where the Shannon entropy is considered.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this letter we give alternative axiomatic systems, which replace the expendability and maximality axioms with the axiom that states the uniform distribution entropy can be analytical continued if it is taken as the function of the distribution dimension, the property that has an important role in asymptotic analysis of entropy [10] (see [11] for alternative approach). The presented results generalizes discussion in [12], where the Shannon entropy is considered.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…By our knowledge, there is no proof that (S4) and continuity are enough, but (S4) and analyticity is working. Showing the latter, in [11] an argumentation reducing everything to the rationals as above has been used.…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where G(•) is a function of {p i }, and F (•) is another continuous function. From the axiomatic formulations of Shannon entropy [22,23,53] or nonextensive entropies [54], F and G should satisfy some axioms as (AE1) Continuity: G is continuous in ∆ d−1 and F is continuous on R;…”
Section: Appendix J: Any State Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%