An autonomous articulating desktop robot for proctoring remote online examinations

Rosen, Warren A.; Carr, M. Eric

doi:10.1109/fie.2013.6685172

Cited by 17 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, both proposed solutions come with their own disadvantages. Requiring students to travel to specific exam sites may not be feasible for remote students, and hiring remote proctors can be expensive (Rosen and Carr, 2013). Indeed, in the current context of the global COVID-19 pandemic, in-person proctoring has been unfeasible in many regions.…”

Section: Methods In Relation To the Medium Of Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Academic Integrity in Online Assessment: A Research Review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a review of current research on academic integrity in higher education, with a focus on its application to assessment practices in online courses. Understanding the types and causes of academic dishonesty can inform the suite of methods that might be used to most effectively promote academic integrity. Thus, the paper first addresses the question of why students engage in academically dishonest behaviours. Then, a review of current methods to reduce academically dishonest behaviours is presented. Acknowledging the increasing use of online courses within the postsecondary curriculum, it is our hope that this review will aid instructors and administrators in their decision-making process regarding online evaluations and encourage future study that will form the foundation of evidence-based practices.

show abstract

Section: Methods In Relation To the Medium Of Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Academic Integrity in Online Assessment: A Research Review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, both proposed solutions come with their own disadvantages. Requiring students to travel to specific exam sites arguably defeats the purpose of distance learning and may not be feasible for remote students, and hiring remote proctors can be expensive (Rosen & Carr, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Academic Integrity in Online Testing: A Research Review

Holden¹,

Va²,

Norris³

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a review of research on online education, with a focus on the methods used to promote academic integrity. Broader issues about how and why academic dishonesty occurs, and the mixed findings in relation to whether or not academic dishonesty may be more or less prevalent in online classes are discussed. Understanding the varied nature of academic dishonesty can improve the implementation of methods used to promote academic integrity, and more importantly, provide students, faculty, and staff with an ethical framework that can extend beyond academia

show abstract

“…Common methods of virtual proctoring a couple years ago such as online video communication (Hylton, Levy, & Dringus, 2016; Weiner & Hurtz, 2017) are being replaced with more sophisticated software (Alessio et al, 2018; Daffin Jr & Jones, 2018). Still, avenues for further innovation have not been exhausted in the field of massive open online courses (MOOCs) (Li et al, 2015), heuristic‐based automatic virtual proctoring systems (Raj, Narayanan, & Bijlani, 2015), multi‐biometric systems (Fenu, Marras, & Boratto, 2018) and autonomous articulating desktop robots for proctoring (Rosen & Carr, 2013). It is thus conceivable that virtual proctoring will outperform human proctors in the near future and become the standard in online, distance and traditional education.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%