2014 Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference (SICE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/sice.2014.6935253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic visual inspection method based on supervised machine learning for rapid on-site evaluation in EUS-FNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The histopathologic evaluation of samples obtained by EUS-guided FNA or FNB can be challenging, the use of an FNB needle can provide more tissue for satisfactory diagnosis and further ancillary testing (Figure 2A-D). Other promising onsite pathological evaluation methods under investigation include telecytopathology and artificial intelligence (AI) using an automated visual inspection system [159,160].…”
Section: Onsite Pathologic Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histopathologic evaluation of samples obtained by EUS-guided FNA or FNB can be challenging, the use of an FNB needle can provide more tissue for satisfactory diagnosis and further ancillary testing (Figure 2A-D). Other promising onsite pathological evaluation methods under investigation include telecytopathology and artificial intelligence (AI) using an automated visual inspection system [159,160].…”
Section: Onsite Pathologic Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI-guided EUS-FNA has shown promising results in numerous studies. AI-enabled automatic visual inspection has proven to be helpful in rapid onsite tissue evaluation by indicating specific areas that are highly likely to indicate tumor cells in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of about 80% [118,119]. Jiang et al showed that the accuracy of AI was 99.6% in differentiating low-versus high-grade neoplasia, and Nuon et al and Machicado demonstrated accuracies of 83% and 82% for AI models in differentiating mucinous cystic neoplasm versus serous cystadenocarcinoma and low versus high-grade dysplasia in intrapapillary mucinous neoplasm, respectively [120][121][122].…”
Section: Artificial-intelligence-augmented Endoscopic Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Inoue et al, an automatic visual inspection method based on supervised machine learning was proposed to assist rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy. The proposed method was effective in assisting on-site visual inspection of cellular tissue in ROSE for EUS-FNA, indicating highly probable areas including tumor cells [33].…”
Section: Integrating Ai In Eus-guided Tissue Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%