2018
DOI: 10.19113/sdufbed.50007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automatic Multilevel Facial Expression Recognition System

Abstract: Facial expression is one of the most natural way of human beings to communicate his-her internal feeling, to stress his-her words, to agree or disagree with the interlocutor, to regulate interaction with the environment and nearby people. This paper challenges the classification experiment run by human beings on the ADFES-BIV database, which is a recently introduced collection of videos expressing low, middle, and high intensity emotions. The proposed automatic system uses the Sparse Representation based Class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even novel techniques like Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) found their place in facial expression recognition, as demonstrated by [44], who employed a Single-hidden-layer Neural Network (NN) for classification and achieved a recognition rate of 89.49% ± 0.76%.…”
Section: Related Work Fermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even novel techniques like Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) found their place in facial expression recognition, as demonstrated by [44], who employed a Single-hidden-layer Neural Network (NN) for classification and achieved a recognition rate of 89.49% ± 0.76%.…”
Section: Related Work Fermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, bio-signal-based algorithms often have better accuracy than speech-based stress-detection systems. Despite this performance obstacle, improving neural network-based techniques by gathering a lot of data makes speech-based stress-detection systems more attractive [4]. Detecting stress in individuals is important for early intervention and prevention of long-term health problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best accuracy for LBP+KNN was 87.44 % when cell size 32 was used, while the best accuracy for LBP+SVM was 90.23% when cell size 32 was used. The characterization experiment was conducted using the ADFES-BIV dataset [7]. They proposed a programmed framework that used a sparse-representation-based classifier and achieved an accuracy of up to 80% by considering the fleeting data inherent in video recordings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%