Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic ear base temperature extraction method for top view piglet thermal image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(iv) Curve extraction technique, such as: curve skeletonization ( Jin et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, some feature extraction methods ( Lu et al, 2016 , 2018 ) may help.…”
Section: Experiments Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) Curve extraction technique, such as: curve skeletonization ( Jin et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, some feature extraction methods ( Lu et al, 2016 , 2018 ) may help.…”
Section: Experiments Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments are carried out on a set of images from LTIR dataset [12], piglet thermal image database [13] as well as OSU thermal pedestrian database [14]. The LTIR database contains sequences of different environments that include natural as well as man-made background, indoors as well as outdoors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our measurements of surface eye temperature underestimated internal body temperature. Most studies that compare the surface temperature of the eye to internal temperature are based on terrestrial animals who do not reside in Arctic environments (Dunbar et al, 2009; Heath et al, 2001; Johnson et al, 2011; Lu et al, 2018; Zinn et al, 1985). These studies typically find no difference in temperature measured by thermal imagery and internal temperature measured by a thermometer (Dunbar et al, 2009; Johnson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%