2013
DOI: 10.1177/1475090213498229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic COLREGs-compliant obstacle avoidance system for an unmanned surface vehicle

Abstract: Unmanned surface vehicles are becoming increasingly vital tools in a variety of maritime applications. Unfortunately, their usability is severely constrained by the lack of a reliable obstacle detection and avoidance system. In this article, one such experimental platform is proposed, which performs obstacle detection, risk assessment and path planning (avoidance) tasks autonomously in an integrated manner. The detection system is based on a vision-LIDAR (light detection and ranging) system, whereas a heuristi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical techniques include artificial potential fields (Naeem et al (2016)) and heuristic A * method (Campbell et al (2014)) developed by the authors' research group, velocity obstacle method (Kuwata et al (2014)) and Evolutionary algorithms (Szlapczynski (2011)). However, most, if not all of the existing techniques do not scale well to multiple target ships and multiple COLREGs rules such as rules 2, 8, 13-17 in Cockcroft and Lameijer (2003), and usually one objective can be considered only when using these techniques.…”
Section: Literature Review and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical techniques include artificial potential fields (Naeem et al (2016)) and heuristic A * method (Campbell et al (2014)) developed by the authors' research group, velocity obstacle method (Kuwata et al (2014)) and Evolutionary algorithms (Szlapczynski (2011)). However, most, if not all of the existing techniques do not scale well to multiple target ships and multiple COLREGs rules such as rules 2, 8, 13-17 in Cockcroft and Lameijer (2003), and usually one objective can be considered only when using these techniques.…”
Section: Literature Review and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this part of the system is only activated and will be continuously building situational awareness picture and assessing the risk, only if a target/obstacle is detected. To assess a risk of collision, the widely-used closest point of approach (CPA) method has been adopted for evaluating if there is a potential collision risk in the near future (Campbell et al (2014); Bertaska et al (2015); Kuwata et al (2014)). Briefly speaking, this method compares the time to closest point of approach (TCPA) and the distance to closest point of approach (DCPA) with prescribed parameters t max and d min , where t max and d min are dependent on the vessel type and also the environment where she is being operated.…”
Section: Situational Awareness and Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these algorithms have good real-time performance, they are difficult to use in complex and irregular environments. To solve this problem, some scholars use the hierarchical structure to combine global path planning and local path re-planning [6,11,12], and some try to improve the traditional path planning algorithm, using for example Rule-based Repairing A* [8]. Liu et al selected the fast marching method (FMM)-based path planning algorithm [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the collision avoidance control algorithm has been developed in mobile robots [23], unmanned vehicles [24,25], and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [26], but there are few studies on USVs. A CAS for USVs emerged in relevant literature [8], in which the fuzzy estimator method was developed for collision avoidance control. The method is able to avoid collision with a change of course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation