2014
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2014.2318694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automatic and Threshold-Free Performance Evaluation System for Building Extraction Techniques From Airborne LIDAR Data

Abstract: Some performance evaluation systems for building extraction techniques are manual in the sense that only visual results are provided or human judgment is employed. Many evaluation systems that employ one or more thresholds to ascertain whether an extracted building or roof plane is correct are subjective and cannot be applied in general. There are only a small number of automatic and threshold-free evaluation systems, but these do not necessarily consider all special cases, e.g., when over-and undersegmentatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective evaluation follows a modified version of a previous automatic and threshold-free evaluation system (Awrangjeb and Fraser, 2014a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The objective evaluation follows a modified version of a previous automatic and threshold-free evaluation system (Awrangjeb and Fraser, 2014a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the performance of the proposed method, the automatic and threshold-free evaluation system (Awrangjeb and Fraser, 2014a) has been employed. It offers more robust objectbased evaluation of building extraction techniques than the thresholdbased system (Rutzinger et al, 2009) adopted by the ISPRS benchmark system.…”
Section: Evaluation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of the building detection step was evaluated using the object-based completeness and correctness measures, as well as the number of split and merge operations (Awrangjeb and Fraser, 2014a). Split operations are required during evaluation due to under-segmentation errors when two or more buildings are detected as one single building.…”
Section: Building Detection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%