2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic and efficient technique for tumor location identification and classification through breast MR images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Features such as wavelet transform [15], pre trained CNN features [19], and high-level CNN features which have been assessed in this study may provide more accepted classification accuracy. Shape, size, texture, and contrast features could also perform well when using efficient classifiers [21]. Combining GLCM features with other feature extraction methods can drastically increase model performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Features such as wavelet transform [15], pre trained CNN features [19], and high-level CNN features which have been assessed in this study may provide more accepted classification accuracy. Shape, size, texture, and contrast features could also perform well when using efficient classifiers [21]. Combining GLCM features with other feature extraction methods can drastically increase model performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features of shape, size, texture, and contrast were extracted. There were 27 features eventually classified by SVM [21]. Furthermore, in 2021, Hilal et al proposed a model to classify MRI breast scans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To surmount the weakness of regular imaging techniques used in machine learning-based approaches, such as limited data size and less information to feed them, Venkata and Lingamgunta 43 introduced a CNN (CNN (LeNet-5)) based diagnosis of breast using Zenker moments which achieved 88.2% sensitivity and 76.92% accurateness, 83.3% sensitivity and 62.5% malignant growth accuracy. Jaglan et al 44 developed a one-ordered algorithm to distinguish breast lesions (normal/abnormal), which consists of an integrated fining technique for de-noising, breast boundary region extraction via selection of nipple and mid-sternum points, and followed by morphological operations and hole filling. For classification, an SVM was implemented in their study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%