2016 IEEE 28th International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2016.0116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automatic and Dynamic Student Modeling Approach for Adaptive and Intelligent Educational Systems Using Ontologies and Bayesian Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This article extends the approach proposed in Ferreira et al, (2016;2017a, 2017b. OSM-V allow students and instructors to assess performance-related information in educational systems.…”
Section: Osm-v: An Open Student Model For Assessment Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This article extends the approach proposed in Ferreira et al, (2016;2017a, 2017b. OSM-V allow students and instructors to assess performance-related information in educational systems.…”
Section: Osm-v: An Open Student Model For Assessment Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Classroom eXperience (CX) is a smart learning environment with content recommendation and personalization capabilities (Araújo et al, 2013;Dorça et al, 2016;Ferreira et al, 2017a), semantic (Ferreira et al, 2016), social and collaborative features (Araújo et al, 2017). It comprises a multimedia capture platform for automatically recording lectures in a classroom equipped with ubiquitous computational devices, such as electronic whiteboards, microphones, video cameras, and multimedia projectors -an infrastructure common today in many schools and universities.…”
Section: Classroom Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Para processar essas inferências, regras SWRL foram criadas, a fim de proporcionar um resultado mais condizente com as reais capacidades dos estudantes, pois além de analisarem o conhecimento, também consideram aspectos comportamentais (nível de colaboração, nível de gamificação, atividades desenvolvidas, etc. iii Context Representação do contexto de acesso [Rezende et al 2015] iii Device Dispositivo usado pelo estudante [Verbert et al 2012, Rezende et al 2015 iii Location Localização do estudante durante o acesso [Verbert et al 2012, Rezende et al 2015 iv Knowledge State Estado de conhecimento do estudante [Nguyen et al 2011] As regras propostas para esse modelo baseiam-se nas informações representadas pela ontologia combinadas com os valores de inferência já realizados por um modelo probabilístico [Ferreira et al 2016] e produzem um resultado que indica o nível de desempenho do estudante. Um detalhe interessante deste modeloé justamente a capacidade de extensão e inclusão de novas regras, visto que cada domínio traz suas próprias características e particularidades.…”
Section: Base De Regrasunclassified
“…These models are mostly in a state of knowledge of learners, learning styles or meta-cognitive characteristics as a reference, using different modeling methods to build models, so as to realize individualized teaching. For example: Dynamic Bayesian networks are used to construct student models to represent multiple skills in one model [1] . Ciolacu et al (2018) used an early recognition system based on machine learning algorithms to predict the final grades of students before the final exam compared with foreign countries, the research on the construction of personalized student model in China is based on the reference of foreign literature, mainly for three aspects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%