2017
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic and accurate registration method for electro‐anatomical map and CT surface

Abstract: Experiments validate that the proposed method registers EAM and CT surface both automatically and accurately.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved convergence rates on the human femur and robustness to noise were achieved by a probabilistic variation of ICP, incorporating both positional and orientational information . A combination of principal‐axes‐based registration and Hausdorff distance minimization was used for automated matching of electro‐anatomical and CT data, applicable on closed surfaces only. Manually delineated salient anatomical features lead to lower target registration error (TRE) than ICP; however, additional tuning of the anatomical features was required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved convergence rates on the human femur and robustness to noise were achieved by a probabilistic variation of ICP, incorporating both positional and orientational information . A combination of principal‐axes‐based registration and Hausdorff distance minimization was used for automated matching of electro‐anatomical and CT data, applicable on closed surfaces only. Manually delineated salient anatomical features lead to lower target registration error (TRE) than ICP; however, additional tuning of the anatomical features was required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 Performing image integration in this way to combine pre-procedural anatomical data from imaging with electroanatomic mapping data may reduce fluoroscopy times 13–20 and procedure times. 16 , 17 , 59 Some studies have found improved clinical outcomes following ablation with image integration, 18 , 60–62 while others have found no difference in outcomes, 13 , 14 , 16 , 63 , 64 which is supported by meta-analysis. 65 A major challenge in image integration remains registration errors between modalities.…”
Section: Section 3: Using Advanced Imaging Techniques To Guide Ablation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“… 68 These potential confounding factors may explain why some studies have found the accuracy of image integration to be insufficient to guide ablation procedures, 69 , 70 while others have reported improved clinical outcomes with image integration. 18 , 60 , 62 , 71 …”
Section: Section 3: Using Advanced Imaging Techniques To Guide Ablation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other non-commercial algorithms have been described but are often more than 10 years old and therefore still had to deal with the low-resolution EAM anatomies of those days [24] , [25] , [26] . Shu et al more recently published another automatic approach to align preprocedural images with EAM but only assessed its performance in 6 patients [27] . Roney et al recently introduced a new method for multi-modal assessment, which involves transforming 3D LA anatomy into a 2D representation called universal atrial coordinates [28] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%