2010
DOI: 10.1039/b921754a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated two-phase microfluidic system for kinetic analyses and the screening of compound libraries

Abstract: Droplet-based microfluidic systems allow biological and chemical reactions to be performed on a drastically decreased scale. However, interfacing the outside world with such systems and generating high numbers of microdroplets of distinct chemical composition remain challenging. We describe here an automated system in which arrays of chemically distinct plugs are generated from microtiter plates. Each array can be split into multiple small-volume copies, thus allowing several screens of the same library. The s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
95
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is difficult to maintain stable coflows that exceed a 1∶9 ratio, and hence to achieve dilutions of greater than 10-fold, which makes this method poorly adapted for studying phenomena such as inhibition where concentrations must be varied logarithmically. Prediluting compounds in microplates (6,14), composing droplets one at a time in a glass capillary (35), or employing on-chip diffusive mixing (36, 37) permits a wider concentration range to be explored, but the sampling of this range becomes sparse, as with microplate-based methods (≤10 concentrations). Better sampling (23 concentrations) can be achieved by manipulating a single nanoliter-volume droplet trapped in a microfluidic channel by splitting and merging buffer droplets (38), but this method has not been applied to screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is difficult to maintain stable coflows that exceed a 1∶9 ratio, and hence to achieve dilutions of greater than 10-fold, which makes this method poorly adapted for studying phenomena such as inhibition where concentrations must be varied logarithmically. Prediluting compounds in microplates (6,14), composing droplets one at a time in a glass capillary (35), or employing on-chip diffusive mixing (36, 37) permits a wider concentration range to be explored, but the sampling of this range becomes sparse, as with microplate-based methods (≤10 concentrations). Better sampling (23 concentrations) can be achieved by manipulating a single nanoliter-volume droplet trapped in a microfluidic channel by splitting and merging buffer droplets (38), but this method has not been applied to screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the miniaturization inherent in this approach, our system ( Fig. 1) is capable of generating doseresponse curves at materially higher resolutions than existing microplate-based (3) and microfluidics-based approaches (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Each dose-response curve contains approximately 10,000 data points, 1,000 times more than in conventional systems, resulting in extremely precise measurement of dose-response relationships using minimal quantities of reagents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, each concentration of chemicals was prepared and tested independently, which somehow diminished throughput and user convenience. Several clever methods have been demonstrated by other group to generate concentration gradients inside droplets, including by varying flow rates of constituting streams of liquid, 30 by on chip-dilution, 31 by using aspiration technique, 32 by droplet-on-demand technology, 33 or by use of droplet libraries. 34 Single cell screen coupled with generation of concentration gradient on the same chip was demonstrated recently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a robust method for sample tracking is required. In previous studies [25][26][27] plugs were simply stored in a sequential fashion (within a microfluidic channel or a piece of tubing), wherein the common fusion or splitting of plugs causes "frameshifts" resulting in loss of information on sample composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%