2023
DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.15769.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated sonic tomography system for the inspection of historical masonry walls

Abstract: Background: The conservation of the built masonry heritage requires a comprehensive understanding of its geometrical, structural, and material characteristics. Non-destructive techniques are a preferred approach to survey historical buildings, given the cultural value of their fabric. However, currently available techniques are typically operated manually, consuming much time at operational and processing level and thus hindering their use for the on-site inspection of heritage structures. Methods: A novel aut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of multispectral imaging, as presented in Section 3.3.1, a direct comparison is enabled between CRP surface colorimetric/metric data and TIR, NIR and/or UV surface data, which might be useful to assess the position and quantitative extent of non-visible anomalies, such as material inhomogeneity [129,130,134], energy losses [131], cracks and mechanical damage [132,136], moist areas [133,135] and weathering patterns [53,60]. Differently, in the case of multisensory data collection, as reported in Section 3.3.2, an indirect comparison is enabled between CRP surface colorimetric/metric data and measurements of constructional discontinuities and pathologies across the components; this comparison is detected as variations in radar reflection from underground structures [143][144][145]147,148]; moist areas [142,146]; or variations in ultrasonic velocities in walls [148,150,151], columns [92,152,153] and pillars [154]. In a few applications, the employment of CRP models to accurately set up onsite tests and equipment is also documented [155][156][157].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of multispectral imaging, as presented in Section 3.3.1, a direct comparison is enabled between CRP surface colorimetric/metric data and TIR, NIR and/or UV surface data, which might be useful to assess the position and quantitative extent of non-visible anomalies, such as material inhomogeneity [129,130,134], energy losses [131], cracks and mechanical damage [132,136], moist areas [133,135] and weathering patterns [53,60]. Differently, in the case of multisensory data collection, as reported in Section 3.3.2, an indirect comparison is enabled between CRP surface colorimetric/metric data and measurements of constructional discontinuities and pathologies across the components; this comparison is detected as variations in radar reflection from underground structures [143][144][145]147,148]; moist areas [142,146]; or variations in ultrasonic velocities in walls [148,150,151], columns [92,152,153] and pillars [154]. In a few applications, the employment of CRP models to accurately set up onsite tests and equipment is also documented [155][156][157].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%