2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated software for real-time quantification of wall shear stress distribution in quantitative coronary angiography data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study WSS computation time was less than 4 minutes for non-bifurcated and less than 5 minutes for bifurcated models including 3D-QCA reconstruction. These ndings are in line with previous reports 5 supporting the potential of this software for clinical use. However, before advocating the use of CAAS Workstation WSS software in the clinical practice further research is needed to explore in retrospective but mainly in prospective studies its value of in detecting high-risk lesions and patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study WSS computation time was less than 4 minutes for non-bifurcated and less than 5 minutes for bifurcated models including 3D-QCA reconstruction. These ndings are in line with previous reports 5 supporting the potential of this software for clinical use. However, before advocating the use of CAAS Workstation WSS software in the clinical practice further research is needed to explore in retrospective but mainly in prospective studies its value of in detecting high-risk lesions and patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The curved-based approach and small number of near-wall layers enable fast analysis without compromising WSS computations. 5 A pulsatile ow pro le was applied at the inlet of the reconstructed segment based on generic timevarying Doppler velocity curves of the studied vessel (e.i, left anterior descending artery, left circum ex or right coronary artery). 9 The blood ow velocity at the in ow of the model was patient-speci c and estimated from the model length, the frame rate of the analysed angiogram and the number of frames required for the contrast to ll the reconstructed segment.…”
Section: D-qca Reconstruction and Wss Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters (pressure, velocity, ESS, and vorticity) provide numerous degrees of freedom, as compared to currently available reduced order CFD methods, and may be able to resolve nuanced disruptions in coronary arterial blood flow. Several works have previously explored the role of ESS, a proatherogenic risk factor, to understand intracoronary hemodynamic patterns that can play role in the plaque formation (Rikhtegar et al, 2012;Szabó et al, 2021;Tufaro et al, 2022). Low fluid velocity and the resulting low ESS on the vessel wall have been reported to be directly related to vessel wall thickening and plaque development (Rikhtegar et al, 2012;Szabó et al, 2021;Tufaro et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have previously explored the role of ESS, a proatherogenic risk factor, to understand intracoronary hemodynamic patterns that can play role in the plaque formation (Rikhtegar et al, 2012;Szabó et al, 2021;Tufaro et al, 2022). Low fluid velocity and the resulting low ESS on the vessel wall have been reported to be directly related to vessel wall thickening and plaque development (Rikhtegar et al, 2012;Szabó et al, 2021;Tufaro et al, 2022). Such hemodynamic risk factors can provide valuable information for physiologic lesion assessment in patients diagnosed with coronary disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%