2010
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2009.2031338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automated Instrument for the Measurement of Bark Microrelief

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent embodiment of the Van Stan et al (2010) bark microrelief instrument reads 15 data points per second from a sub-millimetre accurate laser rangefinder to produce high-resolution (≥10 radii measured per degree) two-dimensional stem profiles (interested readers are referred to Van Stan et al 2010 for further details). Once a scan is complete, the cross-section is broken into triangles, formed by two adjacent measurement points and the origin.…”
Section: Methodological Solution To Determine Sensor Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most recent embodiment of the Van Stan et al (2010) bark microrelief instrument reads 15 data points per second from a sub-millimetre accurate laser rangefinder to produce high-resolution (≥10 radii measured per degree) two-dimensional stem profiles (interested readers are referred to Van Stan et al 2010 for further details). Once a scan is complete, the cross-section is broken into triangles, formed by two adjacent measurement points and the origin.…”
Section: Methodological Solution To Determine Sensor Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing this shortcoming, Friesen et al (2008) suggested the need for a precision mounting method which could quickly and accurately determine orthogonal, neutral bending axes and the placement of sensors. The objective of this technical note is to describe an instrumental method addressing this concern using high-resolution cross-sectional scans from the newly-developed LaserBark TM automated tree measurement system (Van Stan et al 2010) to: (1) estimate the location of orthogonal neutral bending axes for asymmetrical trees; and (2) optimize mechanical displacement sensor placement. The theoretical method outlined within this technical note represents an important development, as hydrologists and foresters currently utilize many forms of strain technology (e.g.…”
Section: Technical Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] High-resolution trunk cross sections for each of the study trees were collected in the center of the installation area using the LaserBark automated tree measurement system [Van Stan et al, 2010]. Then, two orthogonal axes, which pass through the centroid of the trunk cross section, were derived using the operations described in equations (1)-(4) of Van Stan et al [2011a].…”
Section: Mechanical Displacement Sensor Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without precise sensor positioning, these interceptionrelated strain phenomena can be obscured by significant wind throw and off-center loading signals [Friesen et al, 2008;Van Stan et al, 2011a]. Using the LaserBark TM automated tree measurement system [Van Stan et al, 2010], Van Stan et al [2011a] developed a theoretical installation procedure to enhance interceptometer sensor placement and, thereby, remove off-center loading and wind-related distortions. This technical note builds upon our previous theoretical advance by evaluating and validating how well the Van Stan et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BM may also play a significant role in selecting the microbial community structure and function in the bark portion of the phyllosphere [23]. An objective method of quantifying BM is important for understanding and modelling the hydrological processes observed in forest ecosystems [24,25]. Tree bark is a basic container which intercepts water; therefore, improved quantitative characterization of BM is crucial in understanding the influence of tree species and stand age on water interception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%