2010 5th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 11th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop 2010
DOI: 10.1109/asms-spsc.2010.5586913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated fire detection and alerting application based on satellite and wireless communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some indicative examples can be identified e.g. in the area of maritime monitoring [3] [4], land border surveillance [5] and wildfire monitoring [6]. However, despite the specific requirements of each specific application domain, almost all of these platforms share some common aspects such as:…”
Section: A Multi-mission Surveillance Platform: Motivation and Kementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some indicative examples can be identified e.g. in the area of maritime monitoring [3] [4], land border surveillance [5] and wildfire monitoring [6]. However, despite the specific requirements of each specific application domain, almost all of these platforms share some common aspects such as:…”
Section: A Multi-mission Surveillance Platform: Motivation and Kementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this attempt, most results remain at laboratory test level, being rather hazardous to find implementations validated in an actual deployment scenario. In fact, focusing on the implementation and test of complete full-custom WSN dedicated to monitoring environmental parameters, only a few solutions can be found in the open literature [5][6][7][8][9]. However, the use of sophisticated and powerconsuming sensor devices, communication technologies, and protocols results in cost per node, energy requirements, transmit data rate, and required infrastructure which render these solutions unsuitable for battery-operated nodes deployed in natural areas [5][6][7].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, focusing on the implementation and test of complete full-custom WSN dedicated to monitoring environmental parameters, only a few solutions can be found in the open literature [5][6][7][8][9]. However, the use of sophisticated and powerconsuming sensor devices, communication technologies, and protocols results in cost per node, energy requirements, transmit data rate, and required infrastructure which render these solutions unsuitable for battery-operated nodes deployed in natural areas [5][6][7]. In [5], IP video cameras are used for smoke and fire detection, which require high computational power, increasing the cost of both software and hardware; in [6], a Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) subnet is connected to a Global System Mobile (GSM) coordinator which communicates with a PC control center; in [7] a combination is proposed between ZigBee, Wi-Fi, and satellite communications.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model combines terrestrial and space based infrastructures and sensors (SFEDONA, n.d.; Liolis et al, 2010). The terrestrial part is comprised of four general hierarchical levels: (Cunha et al, 2007;Da Silva Severino, 2008).…”
Section: Description Of Basic System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that respect there are no realistic past data or previous operational experience with similar deployed architectures for fire prevention and monitoring. Another motivation is the recently completed Greek pilot project called: Satellite -based FirE DetectiON Automated System (SFEDONA) which was funded by ESA under ARTES -34 framework (SFEDONA, n.d.; Liolis et al, 2010). For our work we are using as a starting step the basic architectural concept of this project and we proceed further providing an analytical and coherent operational system enriched and extended with Earth Observation components as well as with First Responders critical operational communication sub-systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%