Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3238147.3238214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated approach to estimating code coverage measures via execution logs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 10 years later, Chen et al (2018) propose an automated approach to estimate code coverage via execution logs named LogCoCo. The motivation for this use of log data comes from the need to estimate code coverage from production code.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 10 years later, Chen et al (2018) propose an automated approach to estimate code coverage via execution logs named LogCoCo. The motivation for this use of log data comes from the need to estimate code coverage from production code.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selenium IDE is basically a record and playback tool, the test cases generated by Selenium IDE are saved and deployed as JUnit, NUnit test cases. The sample test cases were run through NUnit code coverage [31,32] which achieved the following result over the main modules like performing an insertion and deletion of the records of customers.…”
Section: Experiments and Evaluation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we believe that the development of scalable software analytics practices [25] represents an opportunity to include information from the software operations environment in various development activities, including testing [4,6]. For instance, Winter et al [39] recently brought information about the number of times a log statement is executed to the developer's IDE to raise awareness about the load it represented during the operations of the system.…”
Section: Execution Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%