2015
DOI: 10.14738/jbemi.24.1411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automated Approach for Segmentation of Brain MR Images using Gaussian Mixture Model based Hidden Markov Random Field with Expectation Maximization

Abstract: Manual segmentation of brain tissues from MR images for diagnosis purpose is time consuming and requires much effort even by experts. This has motivated generation of automated segmentation techniques. Moreover, due to presence of noise in an image and its low contrast, it is difficult to correctly delineate tumour from brain MR images. In this paper, a novel hybrid method using Gaussian Mixture Model based Hidden Markov Random Field (HMRF) with Expectation Maximization (EM) has been proposed which segments ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Asymmetry between histogram of squares was thought about in light of Bhattacharya coefficient and most topsy-turvy piece is relied upon to contain edema [10]. With same rule of mind symmetry, Shah, et al [28] introduced a quick bouncing box way to deal with identify tumor or edema. In this technique, normal dice coefficient accomplished are 0.57 and 0.52.…”
Section: State-of-the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymmetry between histogram of squares was thought about in light of Bhattacharya coefficient and most topsy-turvy piece is relied upon to contain edema [10]. With same rule of mind symmetry, Shah, et al [28] introduced a quick bouncing box way to deal with identify tumor or edema. In this technique, normal dice coefficient accomplished are 0.57 and 0.52.…”
Section: State-of-the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternating these two steps, using the current parameters set Θ t . Label set X t is estimated according to MAP [12]:…”
Section: Gmm-based Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) and Eq. (12). If the fitness value of a certain particle is higher than any previous moment, it is regarded as the individual extreme value.…”
Section: Figure 2 Training Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng et al (2014) presented a three step methodology for image segmentation where they employed GMM for partitioning image into small groups followed by calculating the distance between GMM components through Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and finally similar GMM were merged through spectral clustering. Shah and Chauhan (2015) applied Hidden Markov Models (HMM) that used GMM for segmenting brain tumor from MRI images. They employed expectation maximization for achieving their objective and provided comparison with fuzzy c-mean based segmentation.…”
Section: Segmentation Based On Mixture Of Gaussiansmentioning
confidence: 99%