2024
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-024-01792-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An augmented reality approach for communicating intangible and architectural heritage through digital characters and scale models

Sophie Galani,
Spyros Vosinakis

Abstract: Intangible cultural heritage (ICH) represents living cultural expressions and practices that are part of the heritage of a community, and their preservation and transmission are considered highly important. Various methods and tools have been applied so far for the digitization and dissemination of ICH content including a wide range of technologies. Mobile augmented reality is a promising solution along this path that enables the overlap of digital and real-world information in an engaging and efficient manner… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, highly important factors such as the degree of enjoyment are present within the hedonic qualities. Enjoyment, in particular, is a key parameter in XR evaluation approaches employed by researchers [35][36][37], who include it as a major criterion. In the findings, the application of AR has been characterized as enjoyable and, in fact, received the most positive score amongst the assessed factors (pairs of opposite statements).…”
Section: Discussion Of Research Methodology and Findings Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, highly important factors such as the degree of enjoyment are present within the hedonic qualities. Enjoyment, in particular, is a key parameter in XR evaluation approaches employed by researchers [35][36][37], who include it as a major criterion. In the findings, the application of AR has been characterized as enjoyable and, in fact, received the most positive score amongst the assessed factors (pairs of opposite statements).…”
Section: Discussion Of Research Methodology and Findings Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%