2020
DOI: 10.1137/20m1336618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Augmented Lagrangian Preconditioner for Implicitly Constituted Non-Newtonian Incompressible Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strikingly, the continuous augmentation instead adds a term to the displacement-displacement block. This structural distinction does not occur in other problems, such as in stress-velocity-pressure formulations for non-Newtonian flow [29]; here it is caused by the fact that the pressure appears in the equation for the stress (2.9a), rather than the equation for the displacement (2.9b). Nevertheless, the continuous augmentation also successfully controls the Schur complement of the linearised systems [55, Lemma 3].…”
Section: An Augmented Lagrangian Preconditionermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Strikingly, the continuous augmentation instead adds a term to the displacement-displacement block. This structural distinction does not occur in other problems, such as in stress-velocity-pressure formulations for non-Newtonian flow [29]; here it is caused by the fact that the pressure appears in the equation for the stress (2.9a), rather than the equation for the displacement (2.9b). Nevertheless, the continuous augmentation also successfully controls the Schur complement of the linearised systems [55, Lemma 3].…”
Section: An Augmented Lagrangian Preconditionermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Readers interested in analytical and semianalytical solutions to boundary value problems for fluids described by constitutive relations of the type T δ = g(D) or k(T δ , D) = O are referred to Málek et al [8], Le Roux and Rajagopal [7], Srinivasan and Karra [22], Narayan and Rajagopal [23], Fusi and Farina [24], Fusi [25], Housiadas et al [26], Gomez-Constante and Rajagopal [27] and Fetecau and Bridges [28], to name a few. The numerical solution of the corresponding governing equations is investigated in Janečka et al [29], while a rigorous numerical analysis for various models that fall into this class is discussed in Diening et al [30], Stebel [31], Hirn et al [32], Süli and Tscherpel [33], Farrell et al [34], Farrell and Gazca-Orozco [35]. A rigorous mathematical theory for some of the aforementioned models is developed in Bulíček et al [21,36] and Maringová and Žabenský [37]; see also Blechta et al [38] for a recent review.…”
Section: Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either (38) or (35) can serve as a starting point for the specification of constitutive relations. Once we have postulated a formula for Gibbs free energy, which is tantamount to the specification of the energy storage mechanism in the material of interest, we can proceed with the specification of the entropy production mechanisms.…”
Section: Constitutive Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the numerical analysis, in [18] and [44] the authors established (weak) convergence of the finite element approximations to a weak solution of the system for the steady and unsteady problems, respectively. This was later extended to formulations including the shear stress S S S in [21], and an augmented Lagrangian preconditioner was proposed in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%