2004
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An audit of physical restraint and seclusion in five psychogeriatric admission wards in Victoria, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons with previously published results remain difficult, due to lack of uniformity in reporting (Bowers 2000) and heterogeneity of settings. However, from the work that is available, the rates of restraint for all wards in this study are lower than previous studies (DeSantis et al 1997;O'Connor et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparisons with previously published results remain difficult, due to lack of uniformity in reporting (Bowers 2000) and heterogeneity of settings. However, from the work that is available, the rates of restraint for all wards in this study are lower than previous studies (DeSantis et al 1997;O'Connor et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…O'Connor et al . () found that restraint use and types of restraint implemented differed substantially across five acute care psychiatric wards for older persons in the same region of Melbourne, Australia. DeSantis et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there has been little investigation of the use of these containment practices with elderly persons in old age psychiatry inpatient settings, and the rate and type of restraint use can vary, even within neighbouring units [30]. Furthermore, Cochrane reviews of restraint and seclusion [31] and containment practises [32] have concluded that non-pharmacological approaches to restraint and seclusion are not supported by evidence from controlled studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usage varies widely between and within organizations (O'Connor et al . , Gerace et al . ) and globally (ranging from 12% to 47%) (Evans et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%