2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An audio-magnetotelluric investigation in Terceira Island (Azores)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 3‐D codes for modelling and inversion of MT data are now available, the difficulties in deriving realistic models of complex geological structures have meant that most previous studies of volcanic areas (e.g. Matsushima et al 2001; Nurhasan et al 2006; Monteiro Santos et al 2006) have utilized 2‐D models to infer the main features of the resistivity structure. Only Muller & Haak (2004), using a 3‐D forward code based on Mackie & Madden (1993) and Mackie et al (1994), have presented a true 3‐D model of deep electrical conductivity structure beneath a volcano.…”
Section: Modelling Of Conductivity Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although 3‐D codes for modelling and inversion of MT data are now available, the difficulties in deriving realistic models of complex geological structures have meant that most previous studies of volcanic areas (e.g. Matsushima et al 2001; Nurhasan et al 2006; Monteiro Santos et al 2006) have utilized 2‐D models to infer the main features of the resistivity structure. Only Muller & Haak (2004), using a 3‐D forward code based on Mackie & Madden (1993) and Mackie et al (1994), have presented a true 3‐D model of deep electrical conductivity structure beneath a volcano.…”
Section: Modelling Of Conductivity Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include not only a large number of Japanese studies (e.g. Mogi & Nakamura 1993; Ogawa et al 1998; Fuji‐ta et al 1999; Kagiyama et al 1999; Matsushima et al 2001; Asaue et al 2006; Nurhasan et al 2006) but also investigations in North America (Park & Torres‐Verdin 1988; Hill et al 2009), South America (Schilling et al 1997), Indonesia (Muller & Haak 2004), Europe (Manzella et al 2004; Monteiro Santos et al 2006) and the Pacific (Ingham 1992). In this paper, we report the results of an MT study of the structure of Mt Ruapehu and its surrounding area aimed at identifying possible accumulations of magma beneath the volcano, the nature of passages by which magma moves from depth to the surface, and if possible, the link between Ruapehu and the other volcanoes of the Tongariro complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same dataset, 2D inversion with the rEbOcc code (siripunvaraporn & Egbert 2000) confirmed the validity of the 1D approach. recently, 3D results indicated that the ocean effects start above 4 s for the phase and 20 s for the apparent resistivity (Pous et al 2002;Monteiro santos et al 2006). therefore these effects can be neglected for the investigated period range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Field data acquisition and indoor data processing have been underway. AMT survey has already displayed its unusual advantages in prospecting for metal ore, terrestrial heat and geological structures (Schnegg et al 1983, Clerc et al 1984, Bronner and Fourno 1992, Ogawa et al 1994, Balyavskii and Sukhoi 2004, Santos et al 2006, 2007Strangway et al 1973, Yamaguchi et al 2010, Abdelzaher et al 2011. However, because research on the gas hydrate in the permafrost region in our country has been at its very early stage, the AMT method is rarely used to prospect for gas hydrates and few related reports come into sight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%