1998
DOI: 10.1207/15324839851036589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Attributional Explanation for the Effect of Audience Laughter on Perceived Funniness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Producers of television comedy have long realised that a live audience is vital to the atmosphere created for those watching comedy shows at home, as well as to getting the best performances and reactions from the actors (Lawson, Downing, & Cetola, 1998). This has also led to debate about whether 'canned laughter', using sound effects to create the aural illusion of a live audience, has the same impact (Brewer, 2018).…”
Section: Recreating and Reliving Sport During Lockdownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Producers of television comedy have long realised that a live audience is vital to the atmosphere created for those watching comedy shows at home, as well as to getting the best performances and reactions from the actors (Lawson, Downing, & Cetola, 1998). This has also led to debate about whether 'canned laughter', using sound effects to create the aural illusion of a live audience, has the same impact (Brewer, 2018).…”
Section: Recreating and Reliving Sport During Lockdownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental research considering how individuals respond to group laughter tends to focus mainly on perceptions of how funny a stimulus is, whether visually with cartoons and written jokes (Brown, Dixon, & Hudson, 1982;Cupchik & Leventhal, 1974;Donoghue, McCarrey, & Clément, 1983;Leventhal & Cupchik, 1975;Olson, 1992) , audio tapes of jokes, funny stories and stand-up routines (Chapman & Chapman, 1974;Freedman & Perlick, 1979;Fuller & Sheehy-Skeffington, 1974;Gruner, 1993;Lawson, Downing, & Cetola, 1998;Martin & Gray, 1996;Nosanchuk & Lightstone, 1974;Platow et al, 2005;Young & Frye, 1966) , bloopers (Pistole & Shor, 1979;Porterfield et al, 1988) , or scenes from television shows and movies (Devereux & Ginsburg, 2001;Gillespie, Mulder, & Leib, 2016;Lieberman, Neuendorf, Denny, Skalski, & Wang, 2009;Neuendorf & Fennell, 1988) . When the source of the humour is taken into account, findings…”
Section: Intra-audience Effects Of Audience Laughtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although canned laughter might add a dimension of reality to the experience of evaluating comedians, hearing other ingroup or outgroup members laughing might influence an individual's perception of humorous content (Lawson, Downing, & Cetola, 1998;Platow, Haslam, Both, Chew, Cuddon et al, 2005). For instance, jokes were perceived as less funny and less amusing when outgroup laughter was heard, but the opposite was true for ingroup laughter.…”
Section: Common Features Among Appraisals Emotions and Action Endormentioning
confidence: 99%