An Attribution Approach to Consumer Evaluations in Logistics Customer Service Failure Situations

Abstract

The primary goal of this study is to investigate the roles of expectations and purchase criticality on consumers' brand perceptions and attribution behaviors in service delivery failures. The provision of logistics services is often a crucial point in supply chain management that can influence brand perceptions of customers. Indeed, the level and the quality of customer service provided may determine whether the organization will retain existing customers or even attract new ones. As a consequence, a failure in logistics customer service and its effect on overall perceptions of a brand should not be underestimated. Furthermore, the involvement of a third‐party logistics (3PL) company in this failure situation can create considerable shifts in the responses of consumers, especially in the attribution behavior for cause of failure. By applying scenario‐based experiments, this study demonstrates the dynamics by which customer expectations, purchase criticality and 3PL companies affect consumer brand perceptions and attributions. The results suggest the presence of two expectation‐based buffering effects in delivery failures. The first buffering effect is revealed in overall brand evaluation and repurchase intention, while the second buffering effect is observed in consumer brand attribution. The findings indicate that higher expectations may protect the brand and cause more attribution to the third‐party service provider. Additionally, it is shown that criticality of the purchase has crucial impacts on brand evaluations and attributions.

Toward a “Theoretical Toolbox” for the Supplier‐Enabled Fuzzy Front End of the New Product Development Process

“…The outcome of the FFE (i.e., success or failure) can have potential consequences for the firm as well as for the buyer–supplier relationship. How managers interpret these outcomes is important because different interpretations can lead to different strategic responses (e.g., ending a relationship with a supplier or continuing to work with the supplier), which may impact FFE success (Figure ; Gooding & Kinicki, ; Oflaç, Sullivan & Baltacioğlu, ). For example, if a firm enjoys FFE success, it will likely try to reinstate the prior causal network (e.g., use the same supplier in the FFE; Weiner, ).…”

An order allocation model in logistics service supply chain based on the pre-estimate behaviour and competitive-bidding strategy

“…Journal of Supply Chain Management published a special issue on SSC in October 2012, which covered some new progress in SSC, such as Tate and Ellram (2012), Sampson and Spring (2012), Oflaç, Sullivan, and Tunçdan (2012) and Maull, Joana, and Robert (2012). With the emergence of SSC research, studies on the order allocation of SSC have been given much attention.…”

Consequential cognition: Exploring how attribution theory sheds new light on the firm‐level consequences of product recalls

“…Having made inferences about locus of causality, the theory of social conduct (Weiner, ; ) predicts that observers then will assess whether a manufacturer had control over a defective product: “As the next stage in the process, given person causality, it is determined whether the cause was controllable” (1995, p. 11). Observers are motivated to understand whether the product‐harm and recall could have been avoided, and thus seek to understand the firm's controllability in the situation (Folkes, ; Mir, Aloysius, & Eckerd, ; Oflaç et al, ).…”