2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Attempt to Standardize the Calculation of Growth Velocity of Preterm Infants—Evaluation of Practical Bedside Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
78
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(2)]. For very low birthweight hospitalized infants, growth velocity measurements are performed daily or weekly to adjust their fluid and nutrition 4,7,6. Ehrenkranz et al 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2)]. For very low birthweight hospitalized infants, growth velocity measurements are performed daily or weekly to adjust their fluid and nutrition 4,7,6. Ehrenkranz et al 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used quadratic regression splines to fit the measured weights and to calculate weight velocities. Fenton et al 6. combined three very different formulas than our Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-point average method for the 1-day intervals has been considered as the ‘actual or accurate standard’ method 6. We superimposed constant 15 and 20 g/kg/day weight gain velocities on the graphs for comparison, the range of intrauterine weight gain velocities for fetuses to about 36 weeks postmenstrual age 5. For these 21 infants, we mathematically summarised and compared the SD and ranges for the 1-day and 7-day weight gain velocity calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intrauterine growth restriction was categorized as birth weight z-score lower than −1.3. Growth weight velocity was calculated according to an exponential model [24] and was expressed as g/kg/day, and the length and head circumference velocities were calculated according to a linear model [25] and were expressed as cm/day.…”
Section: Clinical and Anthropometrical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%