2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An attempt to electrically enhance phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To remove arsenic from pumped groundwater, the ATUs follow chemical principles of ion exchange and membrane‐based processes (Dominguez‐Ramos et al., 2014; USEPA, 2003), oxidation (Bajpai & Chaudhuri, 1999; Katsoyiannis et al., 2008), coagulation (Jekel & Seith, 2000; Kobya et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2004; Pokhrel et al., 2005), adsorption (Kango & Kumar, 2016; Lunge et al., 2014; Nikolaidis et al., 2003; Uddin & Jeong, 2020), etc., followed by filtration. Few advanced methods consist of phytoremediation (Kubiak et al., 2012) and bioremediation (Dadwal & Mishra, 2017; Gogoi et al., 2017; Katsoyiannis & Zouboulis, 2004; Kumari et al., 2019; Maity et al., 2021; Rahman et al., 2014; Tsai et al., 2009) of the arsenic‐contaminated water. The water treatment media in these units comprise minerals of iron and aluminum for their high sorption and co‐precipitation affinity towards arsenic (Abass et al., 2016; Bora et al., 2016; Guzmán et al., 2016; Habuda‐Stanić & Nujić, 2015; Kobya et al., 2020; Ordonez et al., 2020).…”
Section: Groundwater Treatment and Wastewater Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remove arsenic from pumped groundwater, the ATUs follow chemical principles of ion exchange and membrane‐based processes (Dominguez‐Ramos et al., 2014; USEPA, 2003), oxidation (Bajpai & Chaudhuri, 1999; Katsoyiannis et al., 2008), coagulation (Jekel & Seith, 2000; Kobya et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2004; Pokhrel et al., 2005), adsorption (Kango & Kumar, 2016; Lunge et al., 2014; Nikolaidis et al., 2003; Uddin & Jeong, 2020), etc., followed by filtration. Few advanced methods consist of phytoremediation (Kubiak et al., 2012) and bioremediation (Dadwal & Mishra, 2017; Gogoi et al., 2017; Katsoyiannis & Zouboulis, 2004; Kumari et al., 2019; Maity et al., 2021; Rahman et al., 2014; Tsai et al., 2009) of the arsenic‐contaminated water. The water treatment media in these units comprise minerals of iron and aluminum for their high sorption and co‐precipitation affinity towards arsenic (Abass et al., 2016; Bora et al., 2016; Guzmán et al., 2016; Habuda‐Stanić & Nujić, 2015; Kobya et al., 2020; Ordonez et al., 2020).…”
Section: Groundwater Treatment and Wastewater Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrokinetic coupled phytoremediation using species Lemna minor was tested by Kubiak et al (2012) to remediate toxic arsenic in water. For this test, artificial arsenic water was prepared using sodium arsenate at a concentration of 150 µg L −1 .…”
Section: Electrokinetic-phytoremediation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several applications of EP system in the laboratory scale have been reported on the removal of heavy metal (i.e. Cd, As, Cu, Pb) from contaminated water, and up-take by Lactuta sativa , Lemna minor, Eichornia crassipes , and Pistia stratiotes [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Additionally, this method had been evaluated under the actual conditions to predict the viability of EP system in the future on the remediation of industrial effluents [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%