1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700043452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An attempt to determine the impact of four types of care upon the elderly in London by the study of matched groups

Abstract: SynopsisGroups of elderly people, matched by level of dependency and probability of dementia, were identified in day centres, day hospitals, wards, and local authority homes, and followed up over 9 months to determine the impact of type of care upon outcome. No difference in mortality or changes in dementia scores were found, but the survivors' levels of dependency improved most in day centres and local authority homes. This finding, and the problems of matching, are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second phase a cutoff point of 4/5 on the dementia scale of Blessed et al [5] was used together with the Scale of Evaluation of Depression of the Brief Assessment Schedule of MacDonald et al [25] with a cutoff point of 7/8 to confirm the presence of depression in subjects in whom, once detected, it could be clinically evaluated [26],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second phase a cutoff point of 4/5 on the dementia scale of Blessed et al [5] was used together with the Scale of Evaluation of Depression of the Brief Assessment Schedule of MacDonald et al [25] with a cutoff point of 7/8 to confirm the presence of depression in subjects in whom, once detected, it could be clinically evaluated [26],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generally reported high consumption of (Nilsson et al, 1988;Macdonald et al, 1982), the care of these patients also has an ethical implication which has largely been neglected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary qf the original study (Shah et al, 1992) All the patients were evaluated with the Brief Assessment Schedule (BAS; MacDonald et al, 1982;Mann et ul., 1989), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS; Yesavage et al, 1983), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; Folstein et af., 1975),the DSS (Katona and Aldridge, 1985) and the modified Barthel Index (BI; Wade et al, 1987Wade et al, , 1988.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%