An attempt to construct a Japanese version of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

Shimoda, Shunsuke; Okubo, Nobutoshi; Kobayashi, Michiharu; Sato, Shigetaka; Kitamura, Hideya

doi:10.4992/jjpsy.85.13212

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, several procedures for the assessment of implicit affect have been introduced (Bartoszek, 2009; Hass, Katz, Rizzo, Bailey, & Moore, 1992; Langens, 2002; Quirin, Kazén, & Kuhl, 2009). Among them, the IPANAT (Quirin, Kazén, & Kuhl, 2009; see also Quirin & Bode, 2014) qualified as a standardized and reliable method that has been validated in a number of diverse settings (e.g., De Visch, 2012; Hicks & King, 2011; Kazén, Kuhl, & Quirin, 2014; Quirin, Kazén, Rohrmann, & Kuhl, 2009; Selcuk, Zayas, Günaydin, Hazan, & Kross, 2012; Shimoda, Okubo, Kobayashi, Sato, & Kitamura, 2014; Stieger et al, 2014; Yik et al, 2011).…”

Section: Implicit Versus Explicit Measurement Of Affectmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

Quirin

Wróbel

Pala

et al. 2018

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Self-report measures of affect come with a number of difficulties that can be circumvented by using indirect measurement procedures. The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT) is a recently developed measure of automatic activation of representations of affective states and traits that draws on participants’ ratings of the extent to which nonsense words purportedly originating from an artificial language bear positive or negative meaning. Here we compared psychometric properties of this procedure across 10 countries and provide versions in corresponding languages (Chinese, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Polish, Russian, and Spanish). The results suggest good reliability, metric invariance, and construct validity across countries and languages. The IPANAT thus turns out as a useful tool for the indirect assessment of affect in different languages and cultures.

show abstract

Section: Implicit Versus Explicit Measurement Of Affectmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

Quirin

Wróbel

Pala

et al. 2018

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using a principal component analysis, showed positive versus negative adjective scores of the original IPANAT version load on two orthogonal components, which can be interpreted as positive versus negative affect. The good psychometric properties of the IPANAT have been replicated in more than 10 different languages across different continents (e.g., Hernandez, Rovira, et al, 2020;Quirin et al, 2016;Shimoda et al, 2014). Thus, the IPANAT appears to be a suitable candidate for capturing automatic emotional processes that might underlie any influence of emotional primes (supraliminal or subliminal) on judgment and behavior.…”

Section: Awareness Of Implicit Emotionsmentioning

confidence: 92%

Not self-aware? Psychological antecedents and consequences of alienating from one’s actual motives, emotions, and goals

Malekzad

Jais²,

Hernández³

et al. 2022

Theory & Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Philosophers and scientists have been puzzling over the potential antecedents and consequences of self-awareness or its relative absence since time immemorial. One major reason is the difficulty of identifying individuals’ actual needs, emotions, or goals and thus making statements about their level of self-awareness. Drawing on a “duality of mind” approach, we review our research that quantified discrepancies between first-person perspective and third-person perspective assessments of motives (“needs”), emotions, and goals as indicators of relative self-awareness. Also, we expand on their proximal causes related to personality–situation interactions and their emotional and motivational consequences. We discuss similarities among the three branches of research on motives, emotions, and goals and, lastly, provide an outlook for future research.

show abstract

“…We used the Japanese version of The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect test (IPANAT; Shimoda et al, 2014), which was developed by Quirin et al (2009), to measure emotions without the influence of conscious distortions such as respondents’ social desirability. IPANAT is a measure that reflects the unconscious and automatic aspects of emotions by presenting nonsense spellings of alphabets and asking the respondents to rate what kind of emotion those spellings represent.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and evaluation of a training program to reduce homophobia and transphobia among human resource staff and health professionals in the workplace: A randomized controlled trial.

Matsutaka¹,

Otsuka²,

Tsuno³

et al. 2024

Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We developed a Program for Respect, Inclusion, and Diversity of LGBTQþ Employees (PRIDE), a training program for human resource staff and health professionals to promote appropriate responses to the stress and harassment experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQþ) individuals in the workplace. A randomized controlled trial was used to assess the efficacy of the PRIDE. Sixty-six participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 33) or the wait-list control group (n = 33), and the intervention group received the PRIDE consisting of four sessions. The participants were human resource staff and health professionals in the workplace. To evaluate the effectiveness of the PRIDE, measures of overt and potential homophobia and transphobia, knowledge aboutLGBTQþ people, subjective comprehension of LGBTQþ people, and self-efficacy in responding toLGBTQþ people were completed by both the groups before the intervention, after the second session, after the fourth session, and about 1 month later, and the changes were compared between the groups. The analysis of variance results, in which measurement time and group were taken as independent variables, demonstrated a significant reduction in overt homophobia and transphobia in the intervention group. Additionally, the PRIDE was found to improve the level of participants' knowledge, subjective comprehension, and self-efficacy. The PRIDE developed in this study might be effective in reducing homophobia and transphobia among human resource staff and health professionals. Public Significance StatementA randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of PRIDE, a training program that promotes appropriate responses toward LGBTQþ people in the workplace. The results suggest PRIDE may increase knowledge regarding LGBTQþ people, subjective comprehension of LGBTQþ people, and self-efficacy when responding to and providing support to LGBTQþ people and reduce explicit homophobia and transphobia among occupational health staff and human resource staff with the potential to provide LGBTQþ consultation services.

show abstract

An attempt to construct a Japanese version of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

Cited by 8 publications

References 6 publications

A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

Not self-aware? Psychological antecedents and consequences of alienating from one’s actual motives, emotions, and goals

Development and evaluation of a training program to reduce homophobia and transphobia among human resource staff and health professionals in the workplace: A randomized controlled trial.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About