2017
DOI: 10.4314/sajg.v6i3.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Attempt to Analyse Baarda’s Iterative Data Snooping Procedure based on Monte Carlo Simulation

Abstract: William Sealy Gosset, otherwise known as " Student", Fisher's disciple, was

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rofatto et al [12,55] showed how to compute the probability levels associated with the IDS procedure. They introduced two new classes of wrong decisions for IDS, namely, over-identification positive and over-identification negative.…”
Section: On the Probability Levels Of Iterative Outlier Elimination Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rofatto et al [12,55] showed how to compute the probability levels associated with the IDS procedure. They introduced two new classes of wrong decisions for IDS, namely, over-identification positive and over-identification negative.…”
Section: On the Probability Levels Of Iterative Outlier Elimination Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies by Rofatto et al [12,55] provide an algorithm based on Monte Carlo to determine the probability levels associated with IDS. In that case, five classes of decisions for IDS are described, namely, the probability of correct identification (P CI ), the probability of missed detection (P MD ), the probability of wrong exclusion (P WE ), the probability of over-identification positive (P over+ ), and the probability of over-identification negative (P over− ), defined as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we suggest to the user to analyze the best scenario with different levels of significance (e.g. Rofatto et al, 2017). The analysis of the significance level is outside the scope of this paper and it will be addressed in a future research.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the confidence level and the power of the test are the probabilities of the test result leading to correct decisions, as opposed to the occurrence of type I, II and III errors (see, for example, Förstner, 1983;Teunissen, 2006;Klein et al, 2015b). In addition to these probabilities, the DS can identify more observations than real number of outliers (Rofatto et al, 2017).…”
Section: Preliminary Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%