Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3287098.3287108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An attempt at using mass media data to analyze the political economy around some key ICTD policies in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Governments in theory do exclusively want to meet social objectives, and that too in a democratic manner, but tight interlocks also exist between governments and companies, and capital has often succeeded in shifting the state’s priorities away from social objectives (Sen et al , 2018; Stiglitz, 2012). For example, governments like to use technology as a means of imposing greater control and coordination of the population with a high modernity assumption of bringing social good, even though such initiatives have often disempowered the people and reinforced inequities (Scott, 1998), and capital in its constant search for new customers ingeniously provides such technological innovations to the governments (Sen et al , 2019). The governments too are no less opportunistic, and governments like in India have effectively used information systems to mould public opinion not only for their own populist agenda but to also endorse a vision of bringing social change through technology while obfuscating the scenarios when it leads to harm.…”
Section: Motivations Challenged By Organizational and Political Situatednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governments in theory do exclusively want to meet social objectives, and that too in a democratic manner, but tight interlocks also exist between governments and companies, and capital has often succeeded in shifting the state’s priorities away from social objectives (Sen et al , 2018; Stiglitz, 2012). For example, governments like to use technology as a means of imposing greater control and coordination of the population with a high modernity assumption of bringing social good, even though such initiatives have often disempowered the people and reinforced inequities (Scott, 1998), and capital in its constant search for new customers ingeniously provides such technological innovations to the governments (Sen et al , 2019). The governments too are no less opportunistic, and governments like in India have effectively used information systems to mould public opinion not only for their own populist agenda but to also endorse a vision of bringing social change through technology while obfuscating the scenarios when it leads to harm.…”
Section: Motivations Challenged By Organizational and Political Situatednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corpus contains more than 5 million articles. In prior work, we used this corpus to study media bias in the coverage of several important economic and technology policies in India [32][33][34].…”
Section: Mass Media Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodology is generic though and can be applied to other categorizations as well, for example, to categorize districts based on health or income or education variables, and then understand the pace of growth in these categories. In parallel, we have also built a large corpus of news articles from six primary English language newspapers in India, since 2011 until now, consisting of all articles published on a daily basis [32,33]. The district location of these articles is obtained through an entity extraction method, and the media corpus thus serves as the source of qualitative data to understand the different development patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is the world really becoming a more responsible place by paying attention to ethical concerns that arise from the purely profit-making and shareholder value maximization perspectives of the firm? Floridi suggests that this may is happening due to the increased observability brought about as a result of the information age [64], although media propaganda and rent seeking corporate-government relationships may succeed in countering this [65,76]. If this is really true though then distinctions for profit-based enterprises Vs non-profit donor funded enterprises, or whether they are doing social good or not, may not be necessary going forward.…”
Section: Why Does the World Need Different Kinds Of Enterprises?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is Whatsapp which has evaded any regulatory action on the problem of fake news, and has not undertaken any serious efforts itself to address the issues [78]. It seems that politicians, media, and companies alike, not only work together for collaborative gains but also paint an emancipatory and aspirational picture of technology, which drives rapid uptake but often leads to undesirable outcomes [32,76]. The question this raises then is whether democracies are strong enough for people to be able to shape the political economy to create institutions that can place checks and balances on private and public enterprises alike [79], to ensure that responsible outcomes arise from technology and social good is pursued as their only ethical goal [32,71]?…”
Section: Why Does the World Need Different Kinds Of Enterprises?mentioning
confidence: 99%