2000
DOI: 10.1109/26.843182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An asynchronous multirate decorrelator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides the main challenge for receiver design in multi-rate CDMA systems. Decorrelating receivers have been devised and analyzed in [7]- [9] for synchronous and asynchronous systems respectively. Successive interference cancellation methods are developed in 0090-6778/02$17.00 © 2002 IEEE [10]- [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides the main challenge for receiver design in multi-rate CDMA systems. Decorrelating receivers have been devised and analyzed in [7]- [9] for synchronous and asynchronous systems respectively. Successive interference cancellation methods are developed in 0090-6778/02$17.00 © 2002 IEEE [10]- [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In equation (12), n cd is a Gaussian random variable with mean zero and variance σ Ignoring the other-cell interference, we follow the working principles of the asynchronous multi-rate decorrelator (AMD) of reference [3] to implement the PD. In the other words, while treating the multiuser interference from other cells as a background noise, the PD decodes b is linearly independent of S l ∈ S n,d .…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, two well-known methods derive an equivalent monorate system based on the lowest data rate or highest data rate. The so-called methods are low rate detector (LRD) and high rate detector (HRD), respectively [12,13]. In these methods, the virtual users are directly derived from real users, but with virtual codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works on multirate multiuser detection rely on deriving an equivalent monorate system [12][13][14][15][16][17]. In fact, two well-known methods derive an equivalent monorate system based on the lowest data rate or highest data rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%