2012
DOI: 10.1115/1.4005958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Associative and Non-Associative Anisotropic Bounding Surface Model for Clay

Abstract: An anisotropic elastoplastic bounding surface model with non-associative flow rule is developed for simulating the mechanical behavior of different types of clays. The non-associative flow rule allows for the simulation of not only strain-hardening but also strain-softening response. The theoretical framework of the model is given, followed by the verification of the model as applied to the experimental results of a strain-hardening Kaolin tested under different undrained stress paths. The undrained behavior o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These soils were characterized by an enhanced anisotropic bounding surface model with associative [17] and non-associative [11,12] flow rules. This model was implemented into the PLAXIS computer program [26] for the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These soils were characterized by an enhanced anisotropic bounding surface model with associative [17] and non-associative [11,12] flow rules. This model was implemented into the PLAXIS computer program [26] for the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, three versions of bounding surface model were used. The formulation and predictive capabilities of the enhanced anisotropic bounding surface model with associative and non-associative flow rules have been previously documented [10,12,17].…”
Section: Materials Characterizations and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many simulations, however, were based on relatively simple constitutive models that might not have the capability to realistically describe ground movements due to complex characteristics of soils. For this reason, advanced bounding surface models (Ling et al, 2002;Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012) have recently been used in finite element excavation analyses. This paper describes the use of enhanced anisotropic bounding surface models with associative (Ling et al, 2002) and non-associative flow rules (Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012), in conjunction with the PLAXIS computer program for simulating ground movements associated with deep excavations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, advanced bounding surface models (Ling et al, 2002;Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012) have recently been used in finite element excavation analyses. This paper describes the use of enhanced anisotropic bounding surface models with associative (Ling et al, 2002) and non-associative flow rules (Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012), in conjunction with the PLAXIS computer program for simulating ground movements associated with deep excavations. The proper implementation of the models into PLAXIS was first validated against undrained isotropic and anisotropic triaxial test results under compression and extension shearing modes for various cohesive soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%