1965
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(65)90017-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An association between sporadic-E and the earth's magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Ovezgel'dyyev and Korsunova [1964] found no changes whatever in the diurnal variation of the magnetic field when intense sporadic E persisted for at least two hours. It may just be possible to reconcile this with the other results if we accept Goodwin's [1965a] result. I-Ie found that the horizontal component of the earth's field increased with increasing probability of direct backscatter from irregularities embedded in constant-height sporadic E, but the data were averaged only over 15 min rather than the several hours that Wilkie and MeNieol used.…”
Section: Considered For How Long •Fe8mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…On the other hand, Ovezgel'dyyev and Korsunova [1964] found no changes whatever in the diurnal variation of the magnetic field when intense sporadic E persisted for at least two hours. It may just be possible to reconcile this with the other results if we accept Goodwin's [1965a] result. I-Ie found that the horizontal component of the earth's field increased with increasing probability of direct backscatter from irregularities embedded in constant-height sporadic E, but the data were averaged only over 15 min rather than the several hours that Wilkie and MeNieol used.…”
Section: Considered For How Long •Fe8mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The spread of data poirits in the (E8 , H) analysis of Heisler and Whitehead (1960] would be consistent with either a positive or a negative correlation of (11R, 11H). It cannot therefore be concluded that Goodwin's [1965) analysis supports that of Heisler and Whitehead [1960]. Similarly, it cannot be held that there is apparent conflict, as Goodwin [1965] states, between the latter analysis and that of Wilkie and McNicol.…”
Section: E Vlf Electromagnetic Fields As a Possible Source Of Heatmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It cannot therefore be concluded that Goodwin's [1965) analysis supports that of Heisler and Whitehead [1960]. Similarly, it cannot be held that there is apparent conflict, as Goodwin [1965] states, between the latter analysis and that of Wilkie and McNicol. This point may be illustrated by reference to the following equation [Cole, 1963]:…”
Section: E Vlf Electromagnetic Fields As a Possible Source Of Heatmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation