2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An association analysis of candidate genes on chromosome 15 q11–13 and autism spectrum disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several reports of markers from this interval being in linkage disequilibrium with ASD [111, 113 -118], although there are also studies in which no such association was observed [119,120]. Overall, the studies support the model that one or more genes in the AS/PWS region contribute to ASD, with a continued interest in GABRB3 [116,121]. In this regard, there are conflicting reports of whether GABRB3 is subject to genomic imprinting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…There are several reports of markers from this interval being in linkage disequilibrium with ASD [111, 113 -118], although there are also studies in which no such association was observed [119,120]. Overall, the studies support the model that one or more genes in the AS/PWS region contribute to ASD, with a continued interest in GABRB3 [116,121]. In this regard, there are conflicting reports of whether GABRB3 is subject to genomic imprinting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Most findings were negative in the GABRA5 and GABRG3 regions with ASD 15, 28, 32, 34, 45, 46 . However, Kim et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other approaches described in the present literature propose genotyping of all the coding SNPs (Bergholdt et al, 2005) or a selection of (validated) intragenic SNPs (Curran et al, 2006;Moses et al, 2006), sequencing the gene and comparing discordant subjects (Dash et al, 2006;Lowe et al, 2007), using evenly spaced SNPs throughout the gene (Lou et al, 2007;Palmer et al, 2006), or combinations of the previous methods (Hinks et al, 2006;Nicolae et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2007;Wilson et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2005). This field is clearly evolving rapidly, but it is beyond the scope of this manuscript to go into detail on each of these methods.…”
Section: Snp Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One often used strategy for fine mapping a region found by linkage analysis is to focus on a limited number of candidate genes because (a) only a limited number of genes is present under the linkage peak, or (b) some well established candidate genes are present (Bergholdt et al, 2005;Curran et al, 2006;Lou et al, 2007;Lowe et al, 2007;Palmer et al, 2006). This approach has many advantages: (1) Limiting the number of candidate genes also implies limiting the number of polymorphisms to be assessed; (2) by using established candidate genes, the chance of finding a real causative allele (as opposed to a false positive result) is augmented; (3) restricting the number of polymorphisms diminishes the number of statistical tests, avoids (more or less) stringent correction procedures for multiple testing, as well as limits the chance of a false positive result; and (4) complementary to statistical evidence for association between a gene variant and an examined trait, a real causality can be proven by functional (physiological or biological) evidence for an association.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%