An assessment of water yield ecosystem services in Periyar Tiger Reserve, Southern Western Ghats of India

Abstract

Protected area water yield calculation and mapping are of great importance to the conservation planning and resource management. A water yield model based on InVEST was employed to estimate water yield in Periyar Tiger Reserve, a representative in the Southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. The analysis included land use/land cover, average annual precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, soil depth at various elevation, and plants available water content. The estimated water yield of PTR was 2.33E+09 m3 y-1 with 67% from Periyar river watershed and 33% from Pamba river watershed. A comparison of water-yielding capacity to the forest ecosystems with different vegetations indicates that there is a decreasing trend from evergreen forest, semi-evergreen forest, to grassland-savanna, moist deciduous forest and plantations. It is estimated 37% of evergreen and 24% of semi-evergreen share the major portion of the total water yield, 63.5% of PTR. This study reveals the significance of ecosystem services of the protected area and the importance to conserve and required efficient management.

Assessing Ecological Infrastructure Investments—A Case Study of Water Rights Trading in Lu’an City, Anhui Province, China

“…The water yield module of the InVEST model is based on the principle of water balance, and calculates water yield through parameters such as precipitation, plant transpiration, surface evaporation, root system depth, and soil depth. The calculation equation is as follows [51]:…”

The contributions of climate and land use/cover changes to water yield services considering geographic scale

“…At the spatial scale, single-scale observations may miss or distort the interactions between different factors and water yield services, highlighting the importance of multiscale analyses [ 30 ]. Identifying water yield services at various spatial scales is vital for regional sustainable management [ 31 , 32 ], as water yield services may display different states at different spatial scales [ 33 ].…”

Comparative study on the calculation methods of ecological base flow in a mountainous river

“…By analyzing the applicability of the four major methods, Zhong et al (2006) believes that the Hydrological Index Method is the optimal method for studying the rivers in China. Given that the studies on ecological base flow began late in China, domestic scholars have mostly adopted overseas methods during the early stage (Zhang and Xiong, 2017;Singh et al, 2019;Chacko et al, 2021). Subsequently, some domestic scholars have improved their calculation methods based on the actual circumstances of the study area.…”